Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
346
3
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 473 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
20
346
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Another concern might be that direct interventions are effective for people who already have positive attitudes toward vaccines but will introduce backfire effects or remain ineffective for vaccine skeptics or those with less favorable attitudes toward vaccines (6,7). To test this possibility, we split participants into terciles based on their pretest vaccine attitudes and performed a 3 × 3 factorial ANOVA comparing conditions among each tercile (summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Intervention Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another concern might be that direct interventions are effective for people who already have positive attitudes toward vaccines but will introduce backfire effects or remain ineffective for vaccine skeptics or those with less favorable attitudes toward vaccines (6,7). To test this possibility, we split participants into terciles based on their pretest vaccine attitudes and performed a 3 × 3 factorial ANOVA comparing conditions among each tercile (summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Intervention Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of evidence has demonstrated that the need to correct misperceptions is essential across a broad range of populations and health behaviours e.g. sun protection (Reid & Aiken, 2013), vaccinations (Nyhan & Reifler, 2015), breastfeeding (Reinsma et al, 2015) and obesity (Duncan et al, 2011). Consequently, identifying misperceptions and rectifying them through modern technology would appear to provide an opportunity to overcome barriers associated with more traditional modes of programme delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Todas estas ideas arraigan con tal fuerza en el sistema conceptual de los pseudocientíficos que está documentado el backfire effect en su acercamiento a la evidencia científica (Lord, Ross y Lepper 1979); es decir, el hecho de que, en ocasiones, exponerlos a ella puede ser contraproducente en aras de que abandonen sus concepciones erróneas de la realidad (Nyhan y Reifler 2015). El pseudocientífico se ve a sí mismo como un luchador social, y tiene a mano una gran cantidad de herramientas, bajo la forma de sistemas de ideas autovalidantes (Boudry y Braeckman 2012) o de hipótesis ad-hoc, que permiten racionalizar y aumentar sus niveles de disonancia cognitiva, convirtiendo sistemáticamente las críticas y refutaciones en confirmaciones respecto a sus ideas y a su autoimagen.…”
Section: La Psicología Del Engaño Pseudocientíficounclassified