Does corporate integrity culture matter to corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

Wan, Peng; Chen, Xiangyu; Ke, Yun

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120877

Cited by 62 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Still, it is an effective means to achieve economic success in an organisation (Bouckaert & Van de Walle, 2003). Corporate integrity helps firms to achieve better their goals of social ethics (Francés-Gómez, 2003;Wan, Chen, & Ke, 2020). Integrity earned stakeholders' trust (Audi & Murphy, 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing and Comparing the Level of Corporate Integrity Practices in Malaysian Statutory Bodies

Yahya¹,

Said²,

Zakaria³

et al. 2020

APMAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are few frauds and unethical cases in the Malaysian public sector and that might have contributed to the lower score in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) for Malaysia. Hence corporate integrity is crucial as one of the mechanisms to curb corruption. This study aimed to evaluate and compare corporate integrity practices of federal and state statutory bodies through a survey questionnaire. The measurement for corporate integrity practices is based on three dimensions; ethical foundation, ethical culture and ethical risk management. Based on 194 responses received from the top management of Malaysian statutory bodies, the overall corporate integrity practices showed an above-average score of 5.938 for federal and 5.896 state statutory bodies. The T-test results indicated that there is no significant difference between corporate integrity practices in federal and state statutory bodies. Despite the different resources they have, both types of statutory bodies seem to have and instil an equally high level of corporate integrity practices.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing and Comparing the Level of Corporate Integrity Practices in Malaysian Statutory Bodies

Yahya¹,

Said²,

Zakaria³

et al. 2020

APMAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, the relationship between stakeholders and shareholders and the result of their implementation can have a profound impact on the final carbon reduction performance results. According to Wan et al (2020), the practices of integrity is the principle of honesty, trustworthiness in production and operation activities. The firms can practice adhering compliance and integrity mangement, ensuring the quality of products and information disclosure, caring for their employees and maintain improving the well-being of the community.…”

Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate Governance and Low Carbon Supply Chains: Why Integrity Matters?

Mohter

Fernando

2020

JGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we aimed to understand the role of integrity in low carbon supply chain and their benefits towards firm performance and corporate governance. This paper also discussed the importance of Board of Director (BoD) in decision making in the supply chain. As stakeholders continue to increasingly emphasize integrity practices in their supply chains, the firm should understand and practice the integrity especially involved low carbon supply chain (LCSC) by provided accurate carbon disclosure and report carbon verification and etc. This is important to shareholder especially Board of Director to make sure the firm performance meet their expectation. By monitoring the decision making in the low carbon supply chain, the BoD believe can avoid unethical issues such as corruption, manipulation and fraud. Practising integrity in the supply chain, the firm will obtain many advantages in their firm performance. The firm’s performance will increase other than being more trustable and gain competitive advantages from the competitor. The BoD is concern about the impact of decision making on society. The BoD believe by being integrity in the firm’s management they will meet the social expectation.

show abstract

“…Corporate social responsibility being of high relevance, it is essential to build morale and ethical model of the behaviour of the Russian Federation in business management [19]. According to Wan and Chen, corporate culture increases the social value of an organization, which has a strong positive impact on the efficiency of corporate social responsibility [20]. According to the Chinese doctrine, "focusing only on shareholders' financial return is not consistent with the concept of sustainable corporate governance".…”

Section: The Social Aspect Of State Participation In Corporate Governmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal and social aspects of the state participation in the governance of the large corporations in Russia

Cherkasova

Sosnovskikh

2020

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper evaluates the legal status of the Russian federal government as a corporate governance participant using the example of large sectorial companies. The state commonly regulates economic processes and focuses on pursuing the public interest. It also acts as a guarantor of social responsibility, and this affects decision-making processes in state-owned corporations. In Russia, the federal government has always played an essential role in the business activities of enterprises. Many companies are known to be state-owned or have close links to the state authorities and policymakers. This raises an academic debate concerning the development of market competition, state participation, and business environment. We propose approaches to understanding the participation of the state and unitary enterprises in corporate governance in Russia. By employing secondary data analysis as well as examining the Russian legislation in corporate law, we attempt to determine the legal and social status of the federal government in managing large corporations. This study addresses the issues of the duality of the legal status of the government in corporate governance and its impact on managerial decision-making.

show abstract

Does corporate integrity culture matter to corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

Cited by 62 publications

References 66 publications

Assessing and Comparing the Level of Corporate Integrity Practices in Malaysian Statutory Bodies

Assessing and Comparing the Level of Corporate Integrity Practices in Malaysian Statutory Bodies

Corporate Governance and Low Carbon Supply Chains: Why Integrity Matters?

Legal and social aspects of the state participation in the governance of the large corporations in Russia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About