2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13127-010-0032-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does allometry account for shape variability in Ephedrus persicae Froggatt (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) parasitic wasps?

Abstract: We analysed linear measurements on various parts of the body and the configuration of 11 landmarks on the wing in a large sample of Ephedrus persicae that had emerged from 13 aphid host species, to assess whether static allometry (a measure of the scaling relationship between traits in a population of individuals at the same ontogenetic stage) accounts for variation in body shape. The analysed specimens came from several localities in Europe, Asia Minor, Japan and South America, and cover a large portion of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Size variation among forewings (obtained on the basis of the CS) was examined using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) performed on the centroid size. To see if there were some correlations between the wing size and shape, we performed a regression test between the CS and procrustes coordinates (PC) scores ( Žikić et al, 2010 ). Discriminant analysis using the residuals of the regression test was performed to determine if any of the procrustes distances were statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size variation among forewings (obtained on the basis of the CS) was examined using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) performed on the centroid size. To see if there were some correlations between the wing size and shape, we performed a regression test between the CS and procrustes coordinates (PC) scores ( Žikić et al, 2010 ). Discriminant analysis using the residuals of the regression test was performed to determine if any of the procrustes distances were statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%