2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a ban on informal health providers save lives? Evidence from Malawi

Abstract: Informal health providers ranging from drug vendors to traditional healers account for a large fraction of health care provision in developing countries. They are, however, largely unlicensed and unregulated leading to concern that they provide ineffective and, in some cases, even harmful care. A new and controversial policy tool that has been proposed to alter household health seeking behavior is an outright ban on these informal providers. The theoretical effects of such a ban are ambiguous. In this paper, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But due to cost, logistics and time constraints, we were unable conduct a large sample study, explore the costs of community self-organisation, interview informal providers and collect cost data in this study which may have allowed for more predictive analyses of responses to transaction costs. However, evidence from legislations to ban informal providers from twentieth century Britain [57] and China [58], to contemporary Malawi [26], indicate a slow pace of shifts in preference, which is facilitated by referral linkages from informal to formal providers and “the gradual retirement of the old guard” [57]. Historical studies could investigate institutional change in countries where people have transitioned to near absolute use of formal health services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But due to cost, logistics and time constraints, we were unable conduct a large sample study, explore the costs of community self-organisation, interview informal providers and collect cost data in this study which may have allowed for more predictive analyses of responses to transaction costs. However, evidence from legislations to ban informal providers from twentieth century Britain [57] and China [58], to contemporary Malawi [26], indicate a slow pace of shifts in preference, which is facilitated by referral linkages from informal to formal providers and “the gradual retirement of the old guard” [57]. Historical studies could investigate institutional change in countries where people have transitioned to near absolute use of formal health services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many pregnant women continued to use the services of traditional birth attendants albeit illegally. The ban was controversial and unpopular, it did not result in improved health outcomes, and was lifted in 2010 [26]. More commonly proposed policy responses to limit informal providers in low- and middle-income countries include government intervention to enforce existing regulation, provide training to improve their services, foster relationships between them and formal providers, and reduce demand for their services by improving access to formal providers [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longer-term, we recommend that demand-side incentives be incorporated into the scheme. However, this comes with its own caveats: first, it is clear that cash incentives are not a magic bullet (Murray et al 2014); second, while there is evidence that these incentives help to stimulate demand, there is very little evidence that increased use of services translates to mortality reduction (Godlonton & Okeke 2015;Mazumdar et al 2011;Okeke & Chari 2015).…”
Section: Address Demand-side Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, they underscore the need for interventions addressing both supply-and demand-side barriers simultaneously. Complementarities between the two mean that addressing one without the other may not lead to the desired outcomes (Godlonton & Okeke 2015). It is true that budget and administrative constraints necessarily limit the scope of any intervention, but they reinforce the need for a rigorous needs assessment to ensure that the right trade-offs are being made.…”
Section: Address Other Supply-side Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation