2022
DOI: 10.1080/09540091.2022.2067125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we need to pay technical debt in blockchain software systems?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Yu et al focused on SATD detection in blockchain projects. In particular, in [34], the authors focus on the use of NLP techniques and a maximum entropy classifier for the identification of different types of SATD in a selection of blockchain projects, while in ref. [35], a large-scale pre-trained model for NLP, and in particular BERT, was used to identify the presence or absence of SATD in each comment of a selection of blockchain projects.…”
Section: Technical Debt In Blockchain Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Yu et al focused on SATD detection in blockchain projects. In particular, in [34], the authors focus on the use of NLP techniques and a maximum entropy classifier for the identification of different types of SATD in a selection of blockchain projects, while in ref. [35], a large-scale pre-trained model for NLP, and in particular BERT, was used to identify the presence or absence of SATD in each comment of a selection of blockchain projects.…”
Section: Technical Debt In Blockchain Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we will continue to design stealthy triggers for code models and test backdoor attacks on more software engineering tasks, for example, in tasks such as detecting self-admitted technical debt [62] and software defects prediction [63] [64]. In addition, we are considering using mutation testing or metamorphic testing to perform security testing on code models against poisoning attacks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%