Do Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?

Abstract

Controlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a two-dimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments. However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1 $$\times $$ × AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Generating row–column field experimental designs with good neighbour balance and even distribution of treatment replications

“…In any case, the algorithm has an inbuilt protection to ensure that there is not a large drop in E as a result of achieving a minimum value for the spatial objective function. Whilst it is acknowledged that the construction of experimental designs is traditionally focussed on maximizing the average efficiency factor, the spatial design properties are also an important consideration, especially if some type of spatial analysis is envisaged (Hoefler et al., 2020; Mao et al., 2020). These days readily available computers and software have greatly increased this likelihood.…”

Open-source analytical pipeline for robust data analysis, visualizations and sharing in crop breeding

“…In total, five mixed models were implemented to analyze the data and correct for the experimental design factors and spatial trends (correlated residuals across the field dimensions). More advanced models can be used in phenotypic data analysis to account for the spatial trends [ 13 , 15 ]. However, in this demo, we just showed examples of five mixed models.…”

Smart fertilizers: What should we mean and where should we go?

“…Field trials, indeed, while retaining some characteristics of the lab trials (such as the control groups and the experimental methods), take into consideration the environmental variability of the actual farming conditions and make the experiment more representative (Henke, 2000). Furthermore, the experimental unit size was also included among the selection criteria, as it is considered an important indicator that reflects the level of spatial variability due to a larger occupied area (Hoefler et al, 2020). For this reason, only 126 articles were considered, excluding those using lysimeters and those that did not specify the size of the experimental plot.…”