2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01713-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do serum progesterone levels on day of embryo transfer influence pregnancy outcomes in artificial frozen-thaw cycles?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, even though serum P has been inadequate on the FET day, this was potentially remedied by additional P administration, reinforcing intervention might still be possible beyond the day of transfer. The results were in coincide with the recent report of Volovsky et al, P replacement enhanced the pregnancy outcome if the P on the FET day was lower than 8.0 ng/ml [8]. In a recent study of Polats et al, the intramuscular P supplementation every third day did not increase the ongoing pregnancy rate compared with vaginal P only in vitri ed blastocyst transfer cycles (48.3% vs 51.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, even though serum P has been inadequate on the FET day, this was potentially remedied by additional P administration, reinforcing intervention might still be possible beyond the day of transfer. The results were in coincide with the recent report of Volovsky et al, P replacement enhanced the pregnancy outcome if the P on the FET day was lower than 8.0 ng/ml [8]. In a recent study of Polats et al, the intramuscular P supplementation every third day did not increase the ongoing pregnancy rate compared with vaginal P only in vitri ed blastocyst transfer cycles (48.3% vs 51.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Unfortunately, no data on serum progesterone levels in the three groups were available from that study. The low serum P levels on the FET day in arti cial cycles using vaginal route were previously reported to be associated with poorer reproductive outcomes, the cutoff value was varied in previous reports (5.0-12.0 ng/ml) [5][6][7][8]. In this study, the cutoff value was set as 10.0 ng/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our indings might be dif-ferent from some studies (Ko inas et al, 2015;Labarta et al, 2017) where they could determine the cut-off level of P that's diminished pregnancy outcomes despite their differences in serum threshold, doses & routes of progesterone medications, While (Boynukalin et al, 2019) could determine serum P threshold for improving pregnancy outcomes in FET cycles. Nerveless our results might be closer to (Volovsky et al, 2020) study who performed a large retrospective study of 2010 blastocyst-FET cycles utilized vaginal P stated that neither serum P ≥10 ng/mL nor ≥ 20 ng/ml on embryo transfer day signi icantly improved pregnancy outcomes while level ≥5 ng/ml might improve LBR considering it as the lowest threshold to salvage FET cycles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, body mass index (BMI) and the vaginal environment affect serum levels after vaginal administration, and serum progesterone concentrations show a marked inter-individual difference even when similar doses of progesterone are administered by the vaginal route [ 4 ]. Low serum progesterone levels on the FET day in artificial cycles using vaginal progesterone have been reported to be associated with compromised reproductive outcomes [ 5 7 ]; however, there is no consensus on whether strengthened LPS is beneficial for patients with low progesterone levels in artificial cycles [ 8 , 9 ]. The debate over whether to use a one-size-fits-all regimen or individualized protocols in artificial endometrial preparation cycles is still active.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%