2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do science parks sustain or trigger innovation? Empirical evidence from Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have conducted impact studies of the services offered by technopoles (Corrocher et al 2019;McAdam and McAdam 2008), whose respective results confirm the positive impact on commercial activities and the networking of technopoles' actors. On the contrary, some studies argue that technopole actors depend on more extensive networks than those provided by the technopole in practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Several authors have conducted impact studies of the services offered by technopoles (Corrocher et al 2019;McAdam and McAdam 2008), whose respective results confirm the positive impact on commercial activities and the networking of technopoles' actors. On the contrary, some studies argue that technopole actors depend on more extensive networks than those provided by the technopole in practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Studies that consider the outputs of the innovation process focus mainly on assessing the park effect on patents, new product development and innovation sales. A positive impact on the number of patents filed has been found by Squicciarini (2008), Huang et al, (2012), Lamperti et al, (2017) and Corrocher et al (2019). 8 Corrocher et al ( 2019) also find that STP location increases the likelihood of patenting.…”
Section: Outputsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, whilst there are different indicators for the performance of science parks, the number of patent applications is widely recognized as an important indicator of performance which allows comparison across both a region and nation (Siegel et al, 2003;Squicciarini, 2008;Yang et al, 2011;Villasalero, 2014;Liberati et al, 2016;Albahari et al, 2017;Corrocher et al, 2019;Kou et al, 2020).…”
Section: Measuring University Science Park Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that the number of patent applications provide researchers with more tangible information than the number of projects or other innovation outputs such as obtained through statement-based questionnaires (Patthirasinsiri & Wiboonrat, 2019). The number of patent applications is also deemed to be more reliable innovation measurement when compared with registered patents because grants processes often have multiple issues (Corrocher et al, 2019). Leydesdorff, 2000) is identified within literature to be core to an effective regional innovation ecosystem (Ranga & Etzkowitz, 2013;Brem & Radziwon, 2017) and to the clustering of firms in entities such as science parks (Etzkowitz & Zhou, 2018).…”
Section: Measuring University Science Park Performancementioning
confidence: 99%