2009
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do school break-time policies influence child dental health and snacking behaviours? An evaluation of a primary school programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the strategies used to target these determinants being correctly and appropriately used, the ToyBox-intervention did not manage to significantly change children’s snack consumption. This observation is in line with similar intervention studies ( 27 ) . These findings could be attributed to the fact that dietary behaviour is one of the most complex behaviours and there may be more family-, school- or peer-related determinants than those identified during the preliminary phase of the ToyBox-study (focus groups as well as systematic literature reviews) that might also have an important role in determining dietary choices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the strategies used to target these determinants being correctly and appropriately used, the ToyBox-intervention did not manage to significantly change children’s snack consumption. This observation is in line with similar intervention studies ( 27 ) . These findings could be attributed to the fact that dietary behaviour is one of the most complex behaviours and there may be more family-, school- or peer-related determinants than those identified during the preliminary phase of the ToyBox-study (focus groups as well as systematic literature reviews) that might also have an important role in determining dietary choices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the strategies used to target these determinants being correctly and appropriately used, the ToyBox-intervention did not manage to significantly change children's snack consumption. This observation is in line with similar intervention studies (Freeman & Oliver, 2009). These findings could be attributed to the fact that dietary behaviour is one of the most complex behaviours and there may be more family-, schoolor peer-related determinants than those identified during the preliminary phase of the ToyBoxstudy (focus groups as well as systematic literature reviews) that might also have an important role in determining dietary choices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Turning to oral health literacy, do similar patterns of perception and encodement apply? How do children perceive oral health messages within the context of their social world, how do they manipulate, encode, and transform their parental dietary and toothbrushing rules into their own oral healthcare practices? Two qualitative explorations are presented by way of example.…”
Section: Child Oral Health Literacy: Manipulating Encoding and Tranmentioning
confidence: 99%