Appl. Cognit. Psychol.
 2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<151::aid-acp629>3.3.co;2-q
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Do irrelevant depth cues affect the comprehension of bar graphs?

Martin H. Fischer1
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
8
3
0
0

Citation Types

3
11
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 10 publications

(14 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

3
11
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, accuracy was higher for 2D graphs (M ¼ 86.3 per cent, standard error of the mean -SEM ¼ 2.1 per cent) than for 3D graphs (M ¼ 76.64 per cent, SEM ¼ 2.5 per cent). These findings confirm previous research (Fischer, 2000;Zacks et al, 1998) that suggests that accuracy is lower when 3D graphs are presented. Accuracy was highest for read-off questions (M ¼ 89.8 per cent, SEM ¼ 1.0 per cent).…”
Section: Graph Comprehension Accuracysupporting
confidence: 92%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…As expected, accuracy was higher for 2D graphs (M ¼ 86.3 per cent, standard error of the mean -SEM ¼ 2.1 per cent) than for 3D graphs (M ¼ 76.64 per cent, SEM ¼ 2.5 per cent). These findings confirm previous research (Fischer, 2000;Zacks et al, 1998) that suggests that accuracy is lower when 3D graphs are presented. Accuracy was highest for read-off questions (M ¼ 89.8 per cent, SEM ¼ 1.0 per cent).…”
Section: Graph Comprehension Accuracysupporting
confidence: 92%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…However, Seipel and Carvalho 32 did not find any differences concerning accuracy and time when participants judged the relative heights of single bars visualized on a 2D and a tilted 3D base map. The latter results coincide with those of Fischer, 23 who left the background blank in his study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Experimentalists have confirmed the gratuitous 3 rd dimension leads to less accurate magnitude judgments (Siegrist 1996, Zacks, Levy, Tversky and Schiano 1998, Stewart, Cipolla and Best 2009) and slower decision times (Siegrist 1996, Fischer 2000. However, these effects tend to be small and not particularly robust.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
scite logo

Scite is an AI-powered platform that helps researchers discover and evaluate scientific literature through Smart Citations, showing whether studies support or contradict a claim. Now part of Research Solutions, Scite has indexed 1.6B+ citations, partners with 30+ publishers, and serves 2M users worldwide.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Status

Copyright © 2026 Scite LLC. All rights reserved.

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Research Solutions Logo