2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04362-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparative study by Ulvik et al, the TFL showed a higher SFR (92% vs. 67%, p = 0.002), lower operative time (49 vs. 57 min, p = 0.008), and lower intraoperative adverse event (5% vs. 22%, p = 0.014), compared to the Ho:YAG laser [25]. In a large multicenter study involving 4208 patients who underwent RIRS, Keat et al showed that overall, the TFL was associated with lesser residual fragments (>2 mm), a finding that was confirmed by a multivariate analysis for stones both more and less than 1000 HU [26]. Since residual fragments require second treatment, this is best avoided.…”
Section: Thulium Fibre Laser (Tfl)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a comparative study by Ulvik et al, the TFL showed a higher SFR (92% vs. 67%, p = 0.002), lower operative time (49 vs. 57 min, p = 0.008), and lower intraoperative adverse event (5% vs. 22%, p = 0.014), compared to the Ho:YAG laser [25]. In a large multicenter study involving 4208 patients who underwent RIRS, Keat et al showed that overall, the TFL was associated with lesser residual fragments (>2 mm), a finding that was confirmed by a multivariate analysis for stones both more and less than 1000 HU [26]. Since residual fragments require second treatment, this is best avoided.…”
Section: Thulium Fibre Laser (Tfl)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since the approval of the TFL by the FDA and the EMA, numerous studies have been published showing that the TFL outperforms the Ho:YAG laser in terms of dusting quantity and quality, lower retropulsion, and shorter operation time for any kind of stone [21,[23][24][25][26][27]. In a comparative study by Ulvik et al, the TFL showed a higher SFR (92% vs. 67%, p = 0.002), lower operative time (49 vs. 57 min, p = 0.008), and lower intraoperative adverse event (5% vs. 22%, p = 0.014), compared to the Ho:YAG laser [25].…”
Section: Thulium Fibre Laser (Tfl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is now supplanted by flexible ureteroscopy using thulium lasers, which are more efficient for reducing stones into a powder easily evacuated in urine. 9 KS are composed of multiple crystalline domains. Established methods for KS component characterization include optical microscopy, 1,10 Fourier transform IR spectroscopy, 1 Raman spectroscopy, 6,11−14 (SEM), 15 and X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimal shockwave profile requires classification of the KS type based on its physiochemical composition . Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is now supplanted by flexible ureteroscopy using thulium lasers, which are more efficient for reducing stones into a powder easily evacuated in urine …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies focus on several variables like demographic factors, 1 stone parameters, 2 and intraoperative technical steps and technology used 3 to predict stone-free rate (SFR) and outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in adults and children alike. Similarly, preoperative computerized tomography (CT) imaging for endourological intervention is ideal for kidney stones and to estimate stone parameters like Hounsfield units (HU), 4 and its ability to influence decision-making for RIRS has been well documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%