2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA repair is responsible for the presence of oxidatively damaged DNA lesions in urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
111
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a significant trend for f30% lower breast cancer risk with increased 8-oxodG excretion. Although the nucleotide pool may be a significant source (7), recent data suggest that 8-oxodG in urine is the result of DNA repair and does not result from diet or cell death (27). Thus, our data indicating lower risk at higher levels of urinary 8-oxodG may be related to higher DNA repair activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We found a significant trend for f30% lower breast cancer risk with increased 8-oxodG excretion. Although the nucleotide pool may be a significant source (7), recent data suggest that 8-oxodG in urine is the result of DNA repair and does not result from diet or cell death (27). Thus, our data indicating lower risk at higher levels of urinary 8-oxodG may be related to higher DNA repair activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…8-OxodG can induce GC-TA transversion mutations particularly during DNA replication and thus, if these oxidative lesions are not repaired, they can become mutagenic (Peoples and Karnes, 2005). There is a rather broad consensus that extracellular 8-oxodG levels are not affected by diet, cell death or artefactual formation (Cooke et al, 2005). However, this is the first study to show that oxidative stress observed in cancer cells reflects a good correlation to the serum 8-oxodG levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…6), high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC ECD; ref. 7), HPLC with single (8) or tandem (9) mass spectrometry, 32 P postlabeling (10), immunoassay (11,12), alkaline elution (13), and Comet assay (14), plus other methods based upon the nicking of DNA at oxidized bases by means of repair enzymes (15,16). However, after the publication of the findings from the European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage (17), a number of these techniques have fallen from favor (reviewed in ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%