1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0953-7562(09)80960-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA probes for species and strain identification in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1997 ) is best explained by somatic DNA rearrangements in the DNA sequences which were used to create these subdivisions. These DNA sequences, RC15 and Tel1, were first selected as probes to identify individuals, as they were shown to be hyperpolymorphic ( Marmeisse et al ., 1992 and R. Marmeisse, unpubl. results).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1997 ) is best explained by somatic DNA rearrangements in the DNA sequences which were used to create these subdivisions. These DNA sequences, RC15 and Tel1, were first selected as probes to identify individuals, as they were shown to be hyperpolymorphic ( Marmeisse et al ., 1992 and R. Marmeisse, unpubl. results).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1997 ). The probes used were the RC15 sequence which identifies a single genomic locus ( Marmeisse et al ., 1992 ) and the Tel1 sequence which identifies a small family of unlinked genomic sequences in the H. cylindrosporum genome (R. Marmeisse, unpubl. data; Gryta et al ., 1997 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d-e. restriction Sites), have been reported for several species of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Armstrong, Fowles and Rygiewicz, 1989;Rogers et al, 1989;Egger & Fortin, 1990;Gardes et al, 1990;Egger, Danielson & Fortin, 1991;Martin et al, 1991;LoBuglio, Rogers & Wang, 1992;Marmeisse, Debaud & Casselton, 1992). Although this method may be more sensitive than microbiological and immunochemical methods, it still may lack the sensitivity required to determine the ultimate fate of introduced isolates because of the relatively limited number of target genetic sequences that may be present in one ectomycorrhizal root.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary technique for constructing DNA fingerprints is RFLP analysis which detects length mutations and alterations in base sequences (i.e. restriction sites) (Armstrong et al, 1989;LoBuglio et al, 1991;Martin et al, 1991;Marmeisse et al, 1992b). However, the inability to detect DNA on a single mycorrhiza and utilization of radioactive isotopes prevented the spread of conventional RFLPs in identifying ectomycorrhizal isolates for characterization of community structures.…”
Section: Identification Of Genetic Variability Of Ectomycorrhizal Funmentioning
confidence: 99%