2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74957-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Polymorphism: A Comparison of Force Fields for Nucleic Acids

Abstract: The improvements of the force fields and the more accurate treatment of long-range interactions are providing more reliable molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acids. The abilities of certain nucleic acid force fields to represent the structural and conformational properties of nucleic acids in solution are compared. The force fields are AMBER 4.1, BMS, CHARMM22, and CHARMM27; the comparison of the latter two is the primary focus of this paper. The performance of each force field is evaluated first on it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(103 reference statements)
7
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50,54,58 The overall distribution of water and cations in the (AATT) 2 and in the AT/AT fragments is similar to that reported on the basis of considerably shorter simulations in another paper, 59 also using the CHARMM27 force field. The binding of the charged amino group in the region of high electronegative density is also similar to the results we have obtained in studies of polyamine-DNA interactions.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…50,54,58 The overall distribution of water and cations in the (AATT) 2 and in the AT/AT fragments is similar to that reported on the basis of considerably shorter simulations in another paper, 59 also using the CHARMM27 force field. The binding of the charged amino group in the region of high electronegative density is also similar to the results we have obtained in studies of polyamine-DNA interactions.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…This contains two main variants for modelling DNA: the older CHARMM22 force field, [26] and a more refined CHARMM27. [27] There have been a number of comparisons of how well these two force fields reproduce the behaviour of DNA, [28] and the general consensus is that the CHARMM27 force field is much better. In particular, it correctly predicts B-DNA to be the stable conformation in low ionic strength solvents at normal temperatures, whereas the CHARMM22 force field tends to cause the DNA to adopt an A-like form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibration followed a similar protocol to that used by other research groups. [23,28,37] The DNA atoms were tethered to their original positions with a harmonic force constant of 100 kcal mol À1 À2 and an NVT MD simulation performed for 10 ps at 310 K. A further five 10 ps simulations were then performed successively in which the tethering force constant was 50, 25, 10, 5 and 1 kcal mol À1…”
Section: Docking (Steps 1 and 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA is a structurally polymorphic molecule that can adopt a variety of conformations, which show significant deviation from canonical right-handed DNA (B-DNA) depending on the nucleotide sequence and environmental conditions. 3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The main family of DNA forms identified based on crystallographic analysis of deoxyoligonucleotides are the right-handed A-and B-forms, 16 and the left-handed Z-form. 17,18 A schematic representation of the A-, B-, and Z-form structures of DNA is given in Figure 2.…”
Section: S T R U C T U R a L A N D F U N C T I O N A L A S P E C T mentioning
confidence: 99%