2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.21.392779
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation age analysis of rapamycin in common marmosets

Abstract: Human DNA methylation data have previously been used to develop highly accurate biomarkers of aging (“epigenetic clocks”). Subsequent studies demonstrate that similar epigenetic clocks can also be developed for mice and many other mammals. Here, we describe epigenetic clocks for common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) based on novel DNA methylation data generated from highly conserved mammalian CpGs that were profiled using a custom Infinium array (HorvathMammalMethylChip40). From these, we developed and present… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the advent of DNAm age prediction for humans, age predictors have been created for other species; mice (Table 4 ), rats (Horvath, Singh, et al, 2020 ; Levine et al, 2020 ), dogs (Thompson et al, 2017 ; Wang et al, 2020 ), wolves (Thompson et al, 2017 ), humpback whales (Polanowski et al, 2014 ), chimpanzees (Guevara et al, 2020 ; Ito et al, 2018 ), marmosets (Horvath, Zoller, Haghani, Lu, et al, 2020 ), naked mole rats (Lowe et al, 2020 ), sea bass (Anastasiadi & Piferrer, 2020 ) and zebrafish (Mayne et al, 2020 ) (see Table 5 for a list of non‐human/mouse epigenetic clocks). In 2017, three mouse epigenetic clocks were developed primarily using reduced representation bisulphite sequencing (RRBS) data.…”
Section: Non‐human Epigenetic Age Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the advent of DNAm age prediction for humans, age predictors have been created for other species; mice (Table 4 ), rats (Horvath, Singh, et al, 2020 ; Levine et al, 2020 ), dogs (Thompson et al, 2017 ; Wang et al, 2020 ), wolves (Thompson et al, 2017 ), humpback whales (Polanowski et al, 2014 ), chimpanzees (Guevara et al, 2020 ; Ito et al, 2018 ), marmosets (Horvath, Zoller, Haghani, Lu, et al, 2020 ), naked mole rats (Lowe et al, 2020 ), sea bass (Anastasiadi & Piferrer, 2020 ) and zebrafish (Mayne et al, 2020 ) (see Table 5 for a list of non‐human/mouse epigenetic clocks). In 2017, three mouse epigenetic clocks were developed primarily using reduced representation bisulphite sequencing (RRBS) data.…”
Section: Non‐human Epigenetic Age Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded the common marmoset from our DNA methylation study of sex differences in primates, because marmosets appear to have a unique characteristic when it comes to DNA methylation studies in mammals: it is not possible to predict sex on the basis of methylation data in common marmosets 32 . We used the data from the remaining four primates to identify sex related CpGs in multiple tissues.…”
Section: Conserved Dna Methylation Differences By Sex In Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from other monkeys are described in the companion papers for rhesus macaque (n=283 samples from skin, blood, adipose, cerebral cortex, liver, lung, muscle 31 ), vervet monkey (n=240 samples from whole blood, prefrontal cortex and liver 30 ), and common marmosets (n=95 blood samples 32 ).…”
Section: Data From Other Monkeysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA methylation-based age estimators have been developed for many mammalian species but not yet for opossums [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Here, we present highly accurate epigenetic clocks that apply to both humans and opossum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%