2005
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200

Abstract: Background: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was introduced to determine DNA content (DNA index), but it has not been validated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding does not correlate well with the results of a recent ICDA study on paraffin BE biopsy sections, which showed aneuploidy in 13% of ND, 60-73% of LGD/HGD, and 100% of EAC cases (Fang et al, 2004). This discrepancy could be due to differences of standardization of the image cytometry methods to determine aneuploidy (i.e., different cutoff values to define aneuploidy, different image cytometry systems), the use of tissue section (overlapping and truncated nuclei) instead of brush cytology or an observer variation when classifying the grade of dysplasia in BE (Huang et al, 2005). Brush cytology has potential advantages over endoscopic biopsy for diagnosing BE and monitoring for dysplasia since it has the ability to sample a greater area of the BE mucosa surface, and may therefore detect lesions that are missed by biopsy protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This finding does not correlate well with the results of a recent ICDA study on paraffin BE biopsy sections, which showed aneuploidy in 13% of ND, 60-73% of LGD/HGD, and 100% of EAC cases (Fang et al, 2004). This discrepancy could be due to differences of standardization of the image cytometry methods to determine aneuploidy (i.e., different cutoff values to define aneuploidy, different image cytometry systems), the use of tissue section (overlapping and truncated nuclei) instead of brush cytology or an observer variation when classifying the grade of dysplasia in BE (Huang et al, 2005). Brush cytology has potential advantages over endoscopic biopsy for diagnosing BE and monitoring for dysplasia since it has the ability to sample a greater area of the BE mucosa surface, and may therefore detect lesions that are missed by biopsy protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…12 Briefly, Feulgen-stained slides were automatically scanned. Only the uniformly stained slides were included.…”
Section: Histological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Analysis of the DNA Histograms DNA histograms are plots of DI values vs the number of cells. The presence of peaks of cells with similar DI values and distribution of cells along the histogram were identified.…”
Section: Histological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Various attempts have been made to automate this diagnostic process of nuclear DNA content assessment using computeraided analysis of two-dimensional (2-D) slides. [9][10][11] Currently, the two most common techniques used to quantify DNA content are flow cytometry (FCM) and 2-D image cytometry (ICM). In FCM, the sample is stained with a DNA specific fluorophore [usually diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)]; the cells rapidly flow one-by-one across the focused laser beam and the intensities of the fluorescences emitted are used to quantify the DNA content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%