2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage in blood leukocytes of individuals with sickle cell disease treated with hydroxyurea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, patients with SCA treated with HU had significantly elevated DI values when compared with the patients with SCA who were not treated with HU. Furthermore, the DI values were significantly higher in patients treated for longer periods (>20 months).Similar results were found in two previous studies that evaluated the DNA Damage Index in total peripheral white blood cell counts of SCA patients treated with HU (Friedrisch et al, 2008;Rocha et al, 2012). Taken together, these studies provide evidence for measurable genotoxicity from HU exposure in patients with SCA, but little evidence to support cumulative mutagenicity or carcinogenic potential.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, patients with SCA treated with HU had significantly elevated DI values when compared with the patients with SCA who were not treated with HU. Furthermore, the DI values were significantly higher in patients treated for longer periods (>20 months).Similar results were found in two previous studies that evaluated the DNA Damage Index in total peripheral white blood cell counts of SCA patients treated with HU (Friedrisch et al, 2008;Rocha et al, 2012). Taken together, these studies provide evidence for measurable genotoxicity from HU exposure in patients with SCA, but little evidence to support cumulative mutagenicity or carcinogenic potential.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the literature, the HU ability to cause cancer is controversial and the long-term efficacy and safety of HU in treating patients with SCA remains inconclusive (Steinberg et al, 2010). Some studies have shown that HU is genotoxic while other studies suggest that HU has low mutagenicity in vivo (Hanft et al, 2000;Friedrisch et al, 2008). Furthermore, some reports relate that HU acts as a competitive inhibitor of catalase-mediated hydrogen peroxide decomposition and this effect could be related to in vivo toxicity (Juul et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HU also promotes a reduction in the number of neutrophils, reduced expression of erythrocyte adhesion molecules, and increased synthesis and bioavailability of nitric oxide by the activation of guanylyl cyclase and subsequent increase in cyclic GMP (Friedrisch et al, 2008;Gladwin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current therapy methods of breast cancer such as surgery, radio therapy and chemotherapy improved survival of women suffering breast cancer [3]. Among chemotherapy agents, Hydroxyurea (HU) is commonly used as an anti-cancer agent [4]. For instance, HU is an effective reagent which was widely applied for treatment of acute angina, breast cancer, several hematological malignancies including chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), sickle cell anemia, myeloproliferative disorders, and other known cancers previously [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%