2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00079-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA breakage detection-FISH (DBD-FISH) in human spermatozoa: technical variants evidence different structural features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the recurrence of this associative phenomenon calls attention to the possible role of constitutive heterochromatin as a conductor of chromatin condensation whose role is 'paying the price' of a high incidence of DNA base change. This would also be a plausible explanation for the extremely high incidence of ALS in sperm nuclei associated with heterochromatic regions where a higher chromatin packaging is required (Singh et al, 1989;Fernández et al, 2000;Cortés-Gutiérrez et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, the recurrence of this associative phenomenon calls attention to the possible role of constitutive heterochromatin as a conductor of chromatin condensation whose role is 'paying the price' of a high incidence of DNA base change. This would also be a plausible explanation for the extremely high incidence of ALS in sperm nuclei associated with heterochromatic regions where a higher chromatin packaging is required (Singh et al, 1989;Fernández et al, 2000;Cortés-Gutiérrez et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common types of identified sperm DNA damage are: (i) single and double DNA strand breaks; (ii) the chemical modification of a base by, for example, oxidation or alkylation; (iii) inter-or intrastrand crosslinkage; and (iv) DNA-protein crosslinks. 57,58 A variety of tests have been introduced including terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labelling or TUNEL, 59 comet, 60 in situ nick translation, 61 DNA breakage detection-fluorescence in situ hybridisation, 62 sperm chromatin dispersion test 63 and sperm chromatin structure assay. 64 Some of these tests measure DNA damage directly, such as TUNEL, or comet at neutral pH; others measure DNA damage after denaturation steps, such as the sperm chromatin structure assay, sperm chromatin dispersion and comet at acid or alkaline pH.…”
Section: Morphology and Dna Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither human lymphocytes under alkaline conditions nor sperm under neutral conditions show these DNA breaks, which may represent functional characteristics but not pre-existing SSB (Singh et al 1989). In addition to intracellular processes like DNA replication and DNA repair, which utilise DNA nicking enzymes (Fairbairn et al 1994;McPherson and Longo 1993) during spermatogenesis, the reason for this high number of ALS seems to be the high degree of chromatin condensation (Fernandez et al 2000;Singh et al 1989). Under alkaline conditions, nicks in the DNA seem to provide a starting point for DNA unwinding by transforming the breaks into single strands (Rydberg 1975;Vazquez-Gundin et al 2000).…”
Section: The Use Of Sperm and Testicular Cells In The Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) and the DNA-breakage detection fluorescence in situ hybridisation (DBD-FISH) assays utilising like the comet assay agarose embedded cells but without applying an electrophoretic field (Fernandez et al 2000;Fernandez et al 2003). Other approaches like in situ nick translation (ISNT; Irvine et al 2000) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end-labelling (TUNEL; Gorczyca et al 1993) take advantage of enzymes, which are able to incorporate in situ marker-moleculelabelled deoxynucleotides onto the DNA to detect DNA damage very accurately.…”
Section: In Vitro Comet Assay With Spermmentioning
confidence: 99%