2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00455-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of restriction–modification gene homologues in Helicobacter pylori

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of various bacterial genomes provided evidence that RM gene systems can move between bacterial genomes, which seems to be consistent with their behavior as selfish DNA elements (21,23,31,35,36). Their association with genome rearrangements was inferred from comparisons of closely related bacterial genomes (2,36) and was demonstrated experimentally (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Analyses of various bacterial genomes provided evidence that RM gene systems can move between bacterial genomes, which seems to be consistent with their behavior as selfish DNA elements (21,23,31,35,36). Their association with genome rearrangements was inferred from comparisons of closely related bacterial genomes (2,36) and was demonstrated experimentally (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Comparative analyses of the genomes of H. pylori strains predicted the presence of a large number of putative R-M systems but with a high degree of heterogeneity (196,197). Further analyses revealed that only some of these systems retain enzyme activity (195,198).…”
Section: R-m Systems Of Helicobacter Pylorimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their horizontal transfer between distant groups of bacteria has been suggested by sequence comparison (Malone et al, 1995) and by analysis of their codon usage and GC content (Nobusato et al, 2000a). For instance, RM genes were found in a region of the H. pylori genome that is characterized by the presence of strain-specific genes and translocation events forming the so-called plasticity zone (Alm et al, 1999;Salama et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%