2023
DOI: 10.11609/jott.7980.15.5.23164-23189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of fish species in Kallar Stream, Achankovil River, Western Ghats of Kerala, India

Abstract: The current study presents the findings of fish species inventories conducted at 12 locations in ‘Kallar’, the perennial tributary of the undammed Achankovil River that flows through the Achankovil Reserve Forest in Kerala State. A new checklist of ichthyofauna is prepared, by adding the updated scientific names, which comprises 35 species from 27 genera, 13 families, and eight orders. In order of abundance, Opsarius bakeri, Salmostoma boopis, and Garra surendranathanii were the most prevalent species in the K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four indices of species diversity, the species richness index of Margalef 1 , the Shannon–Wiener index 2 , the Simpson dominance index 3 and the Pielou evenness index 4 , are commonly used indicators. Despite much criticism of these indices over the decades 5 , they are still widely used in fish diversity studies 6 – 12 . However, although these biodiversity indices are able to reflect the differences in diversity between/among study areas, they are unable to indicate which taxa are responsible for these differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four indices of species diversity, the species richness index of Margalef 1 , the Shannon–Wiener index 2 , the Simpson dominance index 3 and the Pielou evenness index 4 , are commonly used indicators. Despite much criticism of these indices over the decades 5 , they are still widely used in fish diversity studies 6 – 12 . However, although these biodiversity indices are able to reflect the differences in diversity between/among study areas, they are unable to indicate which taxa are responsible for these differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%