2018
DOI: 10.1002/lno.11058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergent developmental patterns of induced morphological defenses in rotifers and Daphnia: Ecological and evolutionary context

Abstract: Induced morphological defenses commonly develop in some loricate rotifers as greatly increased spine development and in many species of the cladoceran genus Daphnia as an alteration in the shape and size of its head, producing helmets, crests, and neck spines. This restructuring of the shape of these animals during development, which reduces their vulnerability to a variety of planktonic predators, involves a series of developmental challenges and potential evolutionary constraints for each specific type of de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(282 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite recent progress in investigating the Chaoborus capture process, the mechanism of the predator-defensive role of the neckteeth is still not fully understood (Weiss et al 2018a;Kruppert et al 2019), and although being inducible, the costs for developing neckteeth may be modest (Tollrian and Dodson 1999). However, neckteeth development is often accompanied by other, seemingly more costly, traits such as an elongated tail spine, increased pedestal size, and increased carapace thickness, strength, or stiffness Riessen et al 2012;Rabus et al 2013;Kruppert et al 2017;Riessen and Gilbert 2019). Nevertheless, the similarity in neckteeth and pedestal expression in D. pulex and D. longispina as observed in this study (Appendix 3) suggests that these induced morphological defense traits are evolutionarily very efficient in protecting against predation from Chaoborus larvae.…”
Section: Laboratory Exposure Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Despite recent progress in investigating the Chaoborus capture process, the mechanism of the predator-defensive role of the neckteeth is still not fully understood (Weiss et al 2018a;Kruppert et al 2019), and although being inducible, the costs for developing neckteeth may be modest (Tollrian and Dodson 1999). However, neckteeth development is often accompanied by other, seemingly more costly, traits such as an elongated tail spine, increased pedestal size, and increased carapace thickness, strength, or stiffness Riessen et al 2012;Rabus et al 2013;Kruppert et al 2017;Riessen and Gilbert 2019). Nevertheless, the similarity in neckteeth and pedestal expression in D. pulex and D. longispina as observed in this study (Appendix 3) suggests that these induced morphological defense traits are evolutionarily very efficient in protecting against predation from Chaoborus larvae.…”
Section: Laboratory Exposure Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Neckteeth formation is most studied within the D. pulex complex (see above), but is also described for other species or species complexes (e.g. Boronat and Miracle 1997;Lüning-Krizan 1997;Sell 2000;Benzie 2005;Kotov et al 2006;Riessen and Trevett-Smith 2009;Juračka et al 2010Juračka et al , 2011Riessen and Gilbert 2019). Neckteeth (single, multiple, and rosettes) have also been reported in both pond and lake populations of the D. longispina complex (Juračka et al 2011), covering formerly named D. rosea (Sell 2000(Sell , 2006, which is now assigned to the D. longispina group (Petrusek et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations