Disturbance to Surface Lithic Components of Archaeological Sites by Drill Seeding

Abstract

Federally funded range improvement treatments in the United States require that land managers consider the treatment's impacts to archaeological sites. Pending archaeological clearance can result in the postponement or exclusion of effective seeding practices, which in turn can result in poor seed establishment, increased weeds, recurrent fire, accelerated soil erosion, and damage to cultural sites. Less intensive requirements would help relieve time restrictions, but less-conspicuous sites might be missed. We quantified the displacement and damage that lithic artifacts would incur if missed in an inventory and subsequently subjected to drill seeding treatments. We subjected chert, quartzite, and obsidian materials to impact by a rangeland drill and a no-till drill on sandy and silty soils. Soil texture was the most important factor in perpendicular lithic movement. In the silty soil, lithics were displaced perpendicular to the direction of the drill nearly twice as far as in the sandy soil (7.8 cm 6 0.9 SE vs. 4.1 cm 6 0.6 SE, P , 0.01). No experimental factor showed a difference in absolute displacement (mean 5 15 cm). Damage to lithics was infrequent (25%) and minor with no experimental factor showing statistical significance. Approximately 30% of lithics were buried by treatments. In the sandy soil, the rangeland drill buried lithics 6.5 mm 6 1.6 SE deep, on average, which was twice as deep as the no-till drill in the sandy soil (3.0 mm 6 0.9 SE) and four times as deep as both drills in the silty soil (1.5 mm 6 0.5 SE; P 5 0.03). Minimal effects of drill seeding on lithics suggest that drill seeding could proceed with lessintensive archaeological surveys. Resumen Los tratamientos de mejoramiento de pastizales financiados por el gobierno federal de los Estados Unidos requieren que los manejadores de la tierra tomen consideren el impacto de los tratamientos en los sitios arqueológicos. Dependiendo del permiso arqueológico puede dar lugar a demora o a la prohibición de prácticas efectivas de resiembra, que puede traer como consecuencia, pobre establecimiento de la semilla, incremento en malezas y fuegos recurrentes, erosión acelerada del fuego, y dañ o a los sitios culturales. Unos requisitos menos severos ayudarían a reducir las restricciones del tiempo, pero en sitios menos visibles esto se podría ignorar. Evaluamos el disturbio y el dañ o que los instrumentos de piedra podrían producir si se ignoraran en un inventario y posteriormente se incluyeran para llevar a cabo en los tratamientos de la siembra. Nos enfocamos en los materiales de cuarzo, obsidiana y xert al impacto de la sembradora de pastizales en suelos arenosos y arcillosos. La textura del suelo fue el factor más importante en el movimiento perpendicular lítico. En el suelo arcilloso, los líticos fueron perpendicularmente desplazados en la dirección de la sembradora casi dos veces en comparación con los suelos arenosos (7.8 cm 6 0.9 SE vs. 4.1 cm 6 0.6 SE, P , 0.01). Ningún factor experimental demostró una diferencia en la separación absoluta (media ...

Emerging seed enhancement technologies for overcoming barriers to restoration

“…In many situations, it is not possible to use ground‐based equipment, such as seed drills, due to a host of logistical constraints, such as the site being too steep and/or rocky, high densities of tree skeletons, lack of financial or logistical resources, and cultural constraints (Vallentine ; Bryan et al ). Under these conditions, land managers are limited to using broadcast aerial seeding (Monson et al ).…”

A note on handaxe knapping products and their breakage taphonomy: an experimental view

“…For example, numerous studies have attempted to describe the effects of high-energy fluvial transport on the morphology of items as reflected in breakages caused during the process (Chambers 2003;Hosfield & Chambers 2003;Grosman et al 2011). Other studies have attempted to characterize the breakage pattern of lithic assemblages that have been subjected to various agricultural activities (Mallouf 1982;Rust & Earl 2011). A different approach was to experimentally produce lithic assemblages originating in the production of specific items and to define the typical production-related breakage patterns (Amick et al 1988;Mauldin & Amick 1989;Jennings 2011).…”