1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00893.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance and the community structure of stream invertebrates: patch‐specific effects and the role of refugia

Abstract: 1.We have previously shown that the impact of spates on stream invertebrates may differ among patches separated by distances of metres or less. Here we analyse the species-specific flood responses of larval chironomids and adult and near mature copepods living in different patch types. Four patch types (with eight replicates of each) were compared: the sandy mid-channel, fine sediments around dams, coarse sediments around dams, and dam debris. Additionally, since some fine sediment patches had been shown previ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed some areas of the stream bed to be essentially unaffected by the high flows, whereas others were heavily scoured. This particular response has been observed by others studying the effects of floods on zoobenthos (Palmer et al, 1995;Matthaei et al, 1999a, b), and it is probable that the less disturbed areas act as refugia for macroinvertebrates during a flood (Francoeur et al, 1998). The second larger flood, in contrast, mobilized most of the stream bed and we observed few areas of the study reach that were left undisturbed.…”
Section: General Response Patternssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They observed some areas of the stream bed to be essentially unaffected by the high flows, whereas others were heavily scoured. This particular response has been observed by others studying the effects of floods on zoobenthos (Palmer et al, 1995;Matthaei et al, 1999a, b), and it is probable that the less disturbed areas act as refugia for macroinvertebrates during a flood (Francoeur et al, 1998). The second larger flood, in contrast, mobilized most of the stream bed and we observed few areas of the study reach that were left undisturbed.…”
Section: General Response Patternssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These factors are influencing diversity and abundance (e.g., Vinson & Hawkins 1998) and are scale dependent. At the scale of the reach, numerous factors are associated with species richness, including substrate heterogeneity (Cowie 1985), water chemistry (Townsend et al 1983;Jenkins et al 1984;Erman & Erman 1995), water temperature (Ward & Dufford 1979;Ward 1986), stream flow and size (Jenkins et al 1984;Erman & Erman 1995;Malmqvist & Eriksson 1995;Tate & Heiny 1995), disturbance (Erman & Erman 1995;Palmer et al 1995), and altitude (Tate & Heiny 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have focused on the biological implications of these constraints in terms of processes and mechanisms (Palmer et al 1995, Palmer & Poff 1997, Townsend et al 1997. The community structure is changed by perturbations in the environment and the degree of structural change is used to assess the intensity of the environmental stress (Hellawell 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%