2017
DOI: 10.1590/1983-21252017v30n208rc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DISTRIBUTION OF Meloidogyne enterolobii IN GUAVA ORCHARDS IN THE STATE OF CEARÁ, BRAZIL

Abstract: -Among the factors negatively impacting guava (Psidium guajava) crop in Brazil, one of the most important is the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne enterolobii, which may cause considerable yield losses and even the cessation of guava cultivation in some areas. In addition to affecting guava, the pathogen has been reported as a parasite in various other crops, among them both oleraceous and ornamental crops, as well as in spontaneous vegetation. The aim of this study was to verify the occurrence of M. enterolobii… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the perineal patterns of M. enterolobii are oval shape; the dorsal arch is high and round; phasmids are large, and weak lateral lines occasionally present ( Karssen and van Aelst, 2001 ; Brito et al, 2004 ). However, perineal patterns within the same species may also vary in individuals from the same population, making identification difficult ( Humphreys et al, 2012 ; Da Silva and Santos, 2016 ; Suresh et al, 2019 ). Additionally, M. incognita and M. enterolobii can have very similar perineal patterns ( Humphreys et al, 2012 ; Schwarz, 2019 ; Suresh et al, 2019 ) and M. enterolobii was originally thought to be M. incognita based on perineal pattern analysis.…”
Section: Identification Methods and Population Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the perineal patterns of M. enterolobii are oval shape; the dorsal arch is high and round; phasmids are large, and weak lateral lines occasionally present ( Karssen and van Aelst, 2001 ; Brito et al, 2004 ). However, perineal patterns within the same species may also vary in individuals from the same population, making identification difficult ( Humphreys et al, 2012 ; Da Silva and Santos, 2016 ; Suresh et al, 2019 ). Additionally, M. incognita and M. enterolobii can have very similar perineal patterns ( Humphreys et al, 2012 ; Schwarz, 2019 ; Suresh et al, 2019 ) and M. enterolobii was originally thought to be M. incognita based on perineal pattern analysis.…”
Section: Identification Methods and Population Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1988, a species identified as Meloidogyne mayaguensis in Puerto Rico was thought to be a new species of root-knot nematode. However, based on morphological and molecular data it was reclassified as M. enterolobii in 2004 ( Yang and Eisenback, 1983 ; Castagnone-Sereno, 2012 ; Elling, 2013 ; Da Silva and Santos, 2016 ). The common name, guava root-knot nematode ( Figure 1 ), was given because of the significant damage this nematode has caused to guava fruit trees ( Psidium guajava ) in South America ( Carneiro et al, 2001 ; Schwarz et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Taxonomic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of M. enterolobii to the country may increase as infestation of the pathogen increases, not only in areas of guava production, but also in plantations of other crops (CARNEIRO, ALMEIDA, 2001). In the State of Ceará, the nematode was found associated with the roots of the guava tree in every orchard in the regions they were collected SANTOS, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of antagonistic plants and/or unfavorable hosts is also an alternative for managing nematodes, since they reduce the populations and are used as green manures (Avena spp., Urochloa spp., Crotalaria spp., Mucuna spp., Pennisetum glaucum, and Raphanus sativus var. oleiferus) or for grain production (Arachis hypogaea) (Cunha et al, 2015;Rosa et al, 2015;Silva & Santos, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%