1990
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(90)90373-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and synaptic contacts of the cortical terminals arising from neurons in the rat ventromedial thalamic nucleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local connections lead to correlated dendritic activity, which is then desynchronized by excitatory input to L1 as the animal wakes up. Although L1 is subject to arousal-dependent cholinergic modulation (33,37,38), the fact that blocking AMPA/kainate receptors removes state-dependent synchrony argues against acetylcholine as a mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local connections lead to correlated dendritic activity, which is then desynchronized by excitatory input to L1 as the animal wakes up. Although L1 is subject to arousal-dependent cholinergic modulation (33,37,38), the fact that blocking AMPA/kainate receptors removes state-dependent synchrony argues against acetylcholine as a mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known for the rat that there are less neurons in the frontal cortex than in the posterior areas (Beaulieu, 1993). On the other hand, frontal areas receive a massive input from the contralateral cortical areas via the corpus callosum (Ozaki and Wahlsten, 1993), from the thalamus (Arbuthnott et al, 1990) and from the brainstem (Lamour et al, 1982;Woolf et al, 1983). Therefore, the relative number of synaptic connections formed in the frontal cortex may be higher compared with other areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, we cannot exclude the contribution of a rebound response in corticothalamic neurons Timofeev et al, 2002) and/or of an intrinsic postinhibitory excitation attributable to I h and/or I T . The increase in firing of VM thalamic neurons associated with the termination of the seizure, could be responsible for the postictal rebound of depolarization in striatal output neurons (Arbuthnott et al, 1990;Slaght et al, 2004), which, in turn, might contribute to the transient interruption of firing in SNR neurons at the end of cortical paroxysms (Deransart et al, 2003).…”
Section: Membrane Oscillations and Bursting Of Vm Thalamic Neurons Dumentioning
confidence: 99%