Distributed mobility management with mobile IP

Chan, H. Anthony

doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6364868

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, distributed mobility management schemes have been topical lately but our study will be extended to this type of schemes at a later stage. In particular, [5,6,7], investigates the approaches, issues, requirements and possible distributed mobility management solutions. However, for now, we briefly discuss a few proposals related to PMIPv6 that propose hierarchical-based mobility management solutions to improve handover performance mainly in terms of handover delay and packet loss.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancement to seamless vertical handover in a micro-mobility domain

Magagula

Dlamini

2013

2013 21st International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks - (SoftCOM 2013)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interworking and interoperation of heterogeneous wireless networks over a common IP infrastructure enable ubiquitous access to network services in next generation wireless networks (NGN). This wireless access network heterogeneity combined with the availability of multi-interface mobile devices creates an environment where handovers between different access technologies is inevitable. Therefore, operators with multiple networks will need to facilitate seamless network access across their multiple systems. However, mobility management protocols do not provide seamless handover in their current form. Thus, we propose to introduce a handover coordinator in heterogeneous wireless network environment supported by Proxy Mobile IPv6 to enhance seamless and soft handover that will reduce handover delay and packet loss during the handover period. Simulation results show that the proposed network-based handover mechanism reduces handover delay and number of dropped packets though at the sacrifice of a slight signaling overhead.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancement to seamless vertical handover in a micro-mobility domain

Magagula

Dlamini

2013

2013 21st International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks - (SoftCOM 2013)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Then, network-based distributed mobility management can be achieved by distributing the RM function to the different networks. In order for the packet to be intercepted by the closest RM, anycast can be used [8], or the RM can be located at a network element through which the packets to/from the MN must go [4,7].…”

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distributed Mobility Management with Distributed Routing Management at Access Routers for Network-Based Mobility Support

Ernest

Chan

Falowo

et al. 2015

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

MEC or Multi-Access Edge Computing is a network service delivery architecture that enables cloud computing capabilities at the edge of the access network. Realisation of the MEC vision is challenging with current network technologies: service discovery and routing, secure network slicing and distributed mobility management require complex capabilities in the network. This demo features an OMEC use case realised via RINA, the Recursive Network Architecture. RINA provides interesting properties for OMEC, due to its support for multi-homing, mobility and slicing without special protocols, and security as a first class element of the architecture.

show abstract

“…Therefore, an additional mechanism needs to be implemented on top of the S/PGWs to keep ongoing traffic sessions active for the MNs performing handovers with S/PGW relocation. Different approaches may demand additional components and modifications in the network topology as well as impose further signaling efforts in the network, which must also be taken into account; see [18][19][20][21][22] as examples.…”

Section: Calculation Of the Performance Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative Comparison of the Efficiency and Scalability of the Current and Future LTE Network Architectures

Karimzadeh

Berg

Schmidt

et al. 2017

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The core architecture of current mobile networks does not scale well to cope with future traffic demands owing to its highly centralized composition. Typically, it is believed that decentralization of the network architecture would be a sustainable approach to deal with ever growing amount of mobile data traffic. Nevertheless, the decentralization strategy of network architecture has not been properly examined through quantitative performance studies. Given that LTE will be the leading mobile networking technology in the coming 5-10 years, we conduct a hybrid study model to compare performance of current and future (decentralized) LTE network architectures. Particularly, our analysis presents numerical results quantifying impact of the number of attached nodes on the load at network routers and links, on the latency, and on the processing cost of the user's data and control planes. Analytical results demonstrate that decentralization of the LTE network architecture achieves higher performance compared to the current architecture and improves the latency and cost of data packet delivery more than 10 and 6 times, respectively. Furthermore, it is also observed that GTP outperforms PMIP for all studied performance metrics in the decentralized architecture and provides about twofold better latency and cost for data packet delivery and roughly 6 times lower data traffic load on the network routers.

show abstract

Distributed mobility management with mobile IP

Cited by 19 publications

References 6 publications

Enhancement to seamless vertical handover in a micro-mobility domain

Enhancement to seamless vertical handover in a micro-mobility domain

Distributed Mobility Management with Distributed Routing Management at Access Routers for Network-Based Mobility Support

Quantitative Comparison of the Efficiency and Scalability of the Current and Future LTE Network Architectures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About