2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2236655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Hierarchical Control Architecture for Transient Dynamics Improvement in Power Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the decentralized robust control strategy developed in [26] is adopted herein to improve the damping ratios of the inter-area oscillation modes. In [26], a distributed hierarchical control architecture was proposed for large-scale power systems to improve the transient stability and frequency restoration. However, the capability of this control strategy in enhancing the small signal stability of multiarea power systems has not been analyzed yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the decentralized robust control strategy developed in [26] is adopted herein to improve the damping ratios of the inter-area oscillation modes. In [26], a distributed hierarchical control architecture was proposed for large-scale power systems to improve the transient stability and frequency restoration. However, the capability of this control strategy in enhancing the small signal stability of multiarea power systems has not been analyzed yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works suggest remedial control actions but do not design controllers. Governor-based robust decentralized controller designs using LMIs have been initially pursued for transient-stability in [7], later extended to primary frequency control in [8], and recently developed for wide-area control (WAC) in [9]. In addition to decentralization, the major strengths of these works is that they avoid linearization around operating points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to decentralization, the major strengths of these works is that they avoid linearization around operating points. However, to derive controllers, networks with only generators (by considering model reduction) are considered and bounds on system nonlinearities are assumedbounds that tend to be conservative [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] it is suggested how wind generators can participate in LFC, while others concentrate on effective energy storage [5], or how network loads can be included in LFC [6]. There has also been suggestions to new methods for executing LFC, such as including primary control in local decentralized generators [7], or improving LFC by applying fuzzy logic [8], sliding mode control [9], internal model control [10], and various PID tuning methods [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%