2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed consensus algorithms for merging feature-based maps with limited communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contributions of this manuscript, and novelty with respect to our previous works on distributed map merging [23], [24] are the following: (i) the proposal of the dynamic consensus strategy where, at each step, a discrete-time version of the PI algorithm is executed; (ii) the careful study of the convergence rate of the dynamic consensus strategy; (iii) the applications of this study to characterize the errors in the map merging and understand the trade-offs between the number of iterations and the performance of the algorithm; (iv) the theoretical and experimental study of its time and communication complexity; and (v) the implementation for featurebased maps taking into account the possibly different features discovered by each robot during the exploration. In [23], our robots performed the exploration of the environment, and only at the end of it, ran a static consensus algorithm to merge their maps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contributions of this manuscript, and novelty with respect to our previous works on distributed map merging [23], [24] are the following: (i) the proposal of the dynamic consensus strategy where, at each step, a discrete-time version of the PI algorithm is executed; (ii) the careful study of the convergence rate of the dynamic consensus strategy; (iii) the applications of this study to characterize the errors in the map merging and understand the trade-offs between the number of iterations and the performance of the algorithm; (iv) the theoretical and experimental study of its time and communication complexity; and (v) the implementation for featurebased maps taking into account the possibly different features discovered by each robot during the exploration. In [23], our robots performed the exploration of the environment, and only at the end of it, ran a static consensus algorithm to merge their maps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], our robots performed the exploration of the environment, and only at the end of it, ran a static consensus algorithm to merge their maps. In this paper, instead, robots dynamically merge the information online, i.e., at the same time that they are performing the exploration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the observed noise distribution is zero-mean Gaussian, then, the equation (24) can be computed in Gaussian representation shown on equation (24).…”
Section: F Consensus-based Calculation Of Particles Weight In Distrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3). In practice, robots can execute distributed data association methods [21], [22], [31] for feature-based maps to obtain these relationships. Robots discover new features in the information received from their neighbors, and introduce additional rows and columns in the information matrices and vectors for them.…”
Section: A Initial Correspondence and Data Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%