2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Roles for Conformational Dynamics in Protein-Ligand Interactions

Abstract: Summary Conformational dynamics has an established role in enzyme catalysis, but its contribution to ligand binding and specificity is largely unexplored. Here we used the Tiam1 PDZ domain and an engineered variant (QM PDZ) with broadened specificity to investigate the role of structure and conformational dynamics in molecular recognition. Crystal structures of the QM PDZ domain both free and bound to ligands showed structural features central to binding (enthalpy), while NMR-based methyl relaxation experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether these data uphold the view that the affinity of MnmEG and its homologs to ammonium, glycine and taurine in the presence of different substrate tRNAs may be a key factor for regulating the modification reaction. In this respect, the conformational dynamics of MnmG could play a relevant role in the interaction with the reaction substrates [23], as conformational dynamics can be crucial in tuning the affinity and specificity of molecular interactions [24]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether these data uphold the view that the affinity of MnmEG and its homologs to ammonium, glycine and taurine in the presence of different substrate tRNAs may be a key factor for regulating the modification reaction. In this respect, the conformational dynamics of MnmG could play a relevant role in the interaction with the reaction substrates [23], as conformational dynamics can be crucial in tuning the affinity and specificity of molecular interactions [24]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PGC1a Binding Rigidifies Local Dynamics around AF-2 Site of AncGR2 LBD. Protein dynamics are crucial for enzyme catalysis, ligand recognition, protein allostery, and molecular evolution (Henzler-Wildman and Kern, 2007;Tokuriki and Tawfik, 2009;Motlagh et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2016). Solution-based studies, including nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and HDX coupled with mass spectrometry, allow for measuring protein motions to probe conformational fluctuations that are not readily observed in static crystal structures.…”
Section: Structural Analyses Of Gr Lbd-ligand-pgc1a Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, eight PDZ complexes in the PDB that have Val at the peptide C-terminus all have a different orientation of their α 2 helix, which may increase slightly the volume of the P0 binding pocket. The structure of the QM:Neurexin complex supports this idea, as the Neurexin peptide contains Val at position 0 and the α 2 helix orientation is changed relative to that in WT Tiam1 PDZ (Liu et al, 2016 ). With the larger Met0 side chain, WT:Sdc1-A0M also binds very weakly, ΔΔ G = 1.56 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The peptides were bound to either the wildtype Tiam1 PDZ domain (WT) or a variant containing four amino acid changes (quadruple mutant or QM). The four complexes are WT:Sdc1 (PDB 4GVD) (Liu et al, 2013 ), WT:consensus (PDB 3KZE) (Shepherd et al, 2010 ), QM:Caspr4 (PDB 4NXQ) (Liu et al, 2016 ), and QM:Neurexin (PDB 4NXR) (Liu et al, 2016 ). Ten other complexes involving Caspr4 or its F0A mutant were modeled starting from QM:Caspr4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%