2013
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2014.884058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociable components of phonological and lexical–semantic short-term memory and their relation to impaired word production in aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a related case study, Verhaegen and colleagues administered a phonological and a semantic verbal STM task to two individuals with aphasia, one who demonstrated mostly semantic naming errors and improved performance when phonemic cues were provided, and another who made mostly phonological naming errors and demonstrated no benefit with phonemic cueing. 31 The phonological STM task involved listening to a list of words and determining whether a probe word rhymed with any words on the list, whereas the semantic task involved listening to a list of words and determining whether a probe word was semantically related to any words on the list. The individual with a predominately phonological naming impairment demonstrated impaired performance on the phonological STM task and nonimpaired performance on the semantic STM task, whereas the individual with a predominately lexical-semantic naming impairment demonstrated the opposite profile.…”
Section: Expected Language Deficits Resulting From Verbal Short-term mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a related case study, Verhaegen and colleagues administered a phonological and a semantic verbal STM task to two individuals with aphasia, one who demonstrated mostly semantic naming errors and improved performance when phonemic cues were provided, and another who made mostly phonological naming errors and demonstrated no benefit with phonemic cueing. 31 The phonological STM task involved listening to a list of words and determining whether a probe word rhymed with any words on the list, whereas the semantic task involved listening to a list of words and determining whether a probe word was semantically related to any words on the list. The individual with a predominately phonological naming impairment demonstrated impaired performance on the phonological STM task and nonimpaired performance on the semantic STM task, whereas the individual with a predominately lexical-semantic naming impairment demonstrated the opposite profile.…”
Section: Expected Language Deficits Resulting From Verbal Short-term mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings add to a growing body of literature highlighting the impact of hearing loss on auditory-verbal STM capacities in older adults (e.g., Baldwin & Ash, 2011 ; Cervera al., 2009 ; McCoy et al, 2005 ; Murphy et al, 2000 ; Pichora-Fuller et al, 1995 ; Piquado et al, 2010 ; Rabbit, 1968 ; Rabbit, 1991 ; Schneider & Pichora-Fuller, 2000 ; van Boxtel et al, 2000 ; Verhaegen et al, 2013 ; Wingfield et al, 2005 ; Wingfield et al, 2006 ). Moreover, with exception of the nonword delayed repetition task, these results seem to be consistent with the results of Cervera et al ( 2009 ), Pichora-Fuller et al ( 1995 ), van Boxtel et al ( 2000 ) and Verhaegen et al ( 2013 ), which suggest that the decline in auditory-verbal STM is explained in most part by the participants’ hearing status degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some other studies suggest that auditory impairment may explain age-effects in STM performance more than does aging ( Cervera et al, 2009 ; Pichora-Fuller et al, 1995 ; van Boxtel et al, 2000 ; Verhaegen et al, 2013 ; Wingfield et al, 2006 ). Indeed, Verhaegen et al ( 2013 ) and Wingfield et al ( 2006 ) showed that when matched for hearing thresholds, young and older participants performed equally on auditory-verbal STM tasks ( Verhaegen et al, 2013 ) or on an auditory comprehension task with syntactically simple short sentences ( Wingfield et al, 2006 ), and that the overall performance of both auditory-reduced groups was worse than that of participants with good hearing. Moreover, Cervera et al ( 2009 ) and van Boxtel et al ( 2000 ) further found that after controlling for hearing thresholds with analyses of covariance or partial correlations, differences in STM performance between younger and older participants became non-significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…STM and WM impairments co-occur with aphasia and interfere with core linguistic processing at multiple levels, from phonology and word to sentence and discourse (Martin, 2009; Sung, McNeil, Pratt, Dickey, Hula, Szuminsky & Doyle, 2009). Various theoretical positions about the precise nature of STM and WM impairments and their links to aphasia have been proposed to account for the diverse associative or dissociative patterns of STM and WM functioning (e.g., Majerus, Attout, Artielle, & van der Kaa, 2015; Martin & Allen, 2008; Verhaegen, Piertot, & Poncelet, 2013). For example, Majerus et al (2015) reported that people with aphasia may present with a range of deficits, affecting particular sub-processes of STM functioning: Selective item deficits, selective order deficits, generalized item deficits, and serial order deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%