2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26836-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissection and Documented Skeletal Collections: Embodiments of Legalized Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, de la Cova (2019, 2020), Watkins (Watkins, 2018;Watkins & Muller, 2015), and others (Hunt & Albanese, 2004;Muller et al, 2016) acknowledge the marginalized individuals who comprise the key American anatomical collections upon which biological anthropology has built its reporting standards. While bioarchaeological interpretation will never be comprehensive, since we "face bones, not people" (Fahlander, 2012, p. 139 (Bowleg, 2012;Hinze et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bioarchaeology and Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, de la Cova (2019, 2020), Watkins (Watkins, 2018;Watkins & Muller, 2015), and others (Hunt & Albanese, 2004;Muller et al, 2016) acknowledge the marginalized individuals who comprise the key American anatomical collections upon which biological anthropology has built its reporting standards. While bioarchaeological interpretation will never be comprehensive, since we "face bones, not people" (Fahlander, 2012, p. 139 (Bowleg, 2012;Hinze et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bioarchaeology and Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects qualify as additional intersections that must be considered when examining past and historical groups. For example, de la Cova (2019, 2020), Watkins (Watkins, 2018; Watkins & Muller, 2015), and others (Hunt & Albanese, 2004; Muller et al, 2016) acknowledge the marginalized individuals who comprise the key American anatomical collections upon which biological anthropology has built its reporting standards. While bioarchaeological interpretation will never be comprehensive, since we “face bones, not people” (Fahlander, 2012, p. 139), an intersectional approach allows for a better acknowledgement of the inherent complexity of lived lives.…”
Section: Bioarchaeology and Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skeletal populations these methods are based on are also recent. Therefore, interpretation was conducted with an understanding of the historical, colonial framework which led to these collections and the ancestry classifications they use [100][101][102], as well as evidence for Tudor migration and diversity discussed above. This framing was particularly important in understanding the designation of 'Hispanic' in a Tudor context.…”
Section: Methods Of Ancestry Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the long history of human anatomy and dissection has a chequered past, as extensively pointed out in the prior anatomical and medical literature. Anatomy's cadaver acquisition and dissection activities have been the subject of important review and analysis in the humanities domain (Sappol 2002;Moore 2005;MacDonald 2010;Hurren 2014;Fitzharris 2017;Sawday 1995;Eriksson 1959;von Staden 2007;MacDonald 2006;Rifkin, Ackerman and Folkenberg 2006b), in part, documenting evolution of a discipline within its cultural and social contexts but more importantly providing reflection, recognition, and realization of the unacceptable past actions and events (Muller, Pearlstein and de la Cova 2017;MacDonald 2006MacDonald , 2010Hurren 2014).…”
Section: A Concise History Of Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%