2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30505-9_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting the Largest National Ecosystem of Public Internet eXchange Points in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deployment at ISPs therefore appears to complement the geographical reach of the IXP deployment, over a higher number of locations, but with relatively small deployment sizes at each location compared to IXP ones. Note the absence 6…”
Section: Usamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deployment at ISPs therefore appears to complement the geographical reach of the IXP deployment, over a higher number of locations, but with relatively small deployment sizes at each location compared to IXP ones. Note the absence 6…”
Section: Usamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In strong contrast to the USA, IXP servers are only deployed at 3 locations on the South East Coast (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Porto Alegre) and at one location on the North East Coast (Fortaleza). In Brazil, Netflix has a limited IXP server deployment (in both locations and number of servers), despite a reasonably large number of available IXP locations (25 locations in total according to[6], in the USA Netflix uses 24 IXP locations (Section 4.1)). Deploying servers in IXPs has to be more cost efficient for Netflix due to economies of scale and a simpler contractual situation with fewer parties involved compared to ISP deployment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Section VI concludes the paper and points to avenues for future work. 5 The peering affinity metric and findings from our first analyses were introduced in [3]. 6 https://github.com/intrig-unicamp/ixp-ptt-br…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many countries-notably, Brazil-are taking impressive measures to reduce the likelihood that Internet traffic transits the United States [9-11, 14, 30] including building a 3,500-mile long fiber-optic cable from Fortaleza to Portugal (with no use of American vendors); pressing companies such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter (among others) to store data locally; and mandating the deployment of a statedeveloped email system (Expresso) throughout the federal government (instead of what was originally used, Microsoft Outlook) [8,12]. Brazil is also building Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) [7], now has the largest national ecosystem of public IXPs in the world [15], and the number of internationally connected Autonomous Systems (ASes) continues to grow [13]. Brazil is not alone: IXPs are proliferating in eastern Europe, Africa, and other regions, in part out of a desire to "keep local traffic local".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%