1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf03394096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruptive Behavior and Reinforcement of Academic Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is why it was possible the initial for the class to master more levels (six per week) r the level in the second B condition while averaging 39.57 ige of 3.0 tokens per day, when three level tests were avn a period eraged per week during the first B condition lent of the when 34.81 tokens were earned per day. tests comSecond, the whole class of hyperactive stufinal stage dents responded to dimensions of the token system in the same way as fewer numbers of hyper-I students active children had (e.g., Ayllon et al, 1972; asented in Patterson et al, 1965) and classes of nonhyperinvestiga-active students (O'Leary, Becker, Evans, & Sau-) two stu-dargas, 1969;O'Leary & Drabman, 1971). The in primer, children responded quickly to the system as is vel Three evidenced in Figure 1 which shows that a subBy the end stantial number of tokens were earned during primer or the first day the system was in effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is why it was possible the initial for the class to master more levels (six per week) r the level in the second B condition while averaging 39.57 ige of 3.0 tokens per day, when three level tests were avn a period eraged per week during the first B condition lent of the when 34.81 tokens were earned per day. tests comSecond, the whole class of hyperactive stufinal stage dents responded to dimensions of the token system in the same way as fewer numbers of hyper-I students active children had (e.g., Ayllon et al, 1972; asented in Patterson et al, 1965) and classes of nonhyperinvestiga-active students (O'Leary, Becker, Evans, & Sau-) two stu-dargas, 1969;O'Leary & Drabman, 1971). The in primer, children responded quickly to the system as is vel Three evidenced in Figure 1 which shows that a subBy the end stantial number of tokens were earned during primer or the first day the system was in effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ayllon, Layman, and Burke (1972) increased math and reading performance in four teenage hyperactive boys using a token economy with food and games as back-up reinforcers. Using an ABAB design, Ayllon and Roberts (1974) employed a point system with back-up reinforcers to increase the reading accuracy from 50 to 70%' in five boys in the same fifth-grade class.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Related routines have been suggested a very important way to assist children have academic problems at school (Belfiore & Hutchinson, 1998). These routines can be established via scheduling and increasing the number of minutes devoted to academic instruction (Belfiore & Hutchinson, 1998), setting up classroom structure (Ayllon, Layman, & Burke, 1972), having a classroom token economy in place (McLaughlin & Williams, 1988), or by employing various opportunity to respond procedures such as classwide peer tutoring (Greenwood, Delquadri, & Hall, 1991), copy, cover, and compare (Skinner et al, 1997) or Direct Instruction curricula and teaching procedures (Kameenui, 1998;Stein et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistical analysis of parts of the data suggests that IQ scores were independent of average production rates. Ayllon, Layman and Burke (1972) conducted a study designed to strengthen academic performance in four highly disruptive, educable mentally retarded 12-to 13-year-old boys. Merely presenting academic material on a s~s tematic basis virtually eliminated their dISruptive behaviour.…”
Section: Emphasis On Early Learning and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%