1984
DOI: 10.1049/ip-h-1.1984.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion in unilateral fin lines with two dielectric layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the value of the effective dielectric constant (E," = p 2 / k 2 ) for the dominant mode as a function of the fin width. These results are indistinguishable from those given in [5] and [6]. CONCLUSION In this paper, an approach combining the equivalent magnetic current for slot electric fields with the spectral domain immittance method has been introduced.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 7 shows the value of the effective dielectric constant (E," = p 2 / k 2 ) for the dominant mode as a function of the fin width. These results are indistinguishable from those given in [5] and [6]. CONCLUSION In this paper, an approach combining the equivalent magnetic current for slot electric fields with the spectral domain immittance method has been introduced.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Thus far, electromagnetic models with sufficiently good accuracies have been reported for the waveguide [2] and stripline [6] versions of the symmetrical five-port coupler. The microstrip version, however, continues to elude rigorous treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it will also be used to briefly discuss how the preceding formulation can be altered to study apertures in guiding structures such as the fin-line (see Figure 6). Furthermore, by solving the fin-line problem, the accuracy of the approach can be proven by duplicating previously published results by [5] and [6]. The formulation of the fin-line problem proceeds much as the general aperture problem.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%