We study the relation between quasi-normal modes (QNMs) and transmission resonances (TRs) in one-dimensional (1D) disordered systems. We show for the first time that while each maximum in the transmission coefficient is always related to a QNM, the reverse statement is not necessarily correct. There exists an intermediate state, where only part of the QNMs are localized and these QNMs provide a resonant transmission. The rest of the solutions of the eigenvalue problem (denoted as strange quasi-modes) are never found in regular open cavities and resonators, and arise exclusively due to random scatterings. Although these strange QNMs belong to a discrete spectrum, they are not localized and not associated with any anomalies in the transmission. The ratio of the number of the normal QNMs to the total number of QNMs is independent of the type of disorder, and deviates only slightly from the constant 2/5 in rather wide ranges of the strength of a single scattering and the length of the random sample.Wave processes in open systems can be described in terms of quasi-normal modes (QNMs), which are a generalization of the notion of normal modes for closed systems, to open structures, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The corresponding eigenfrequencies are complex, so that the imaginary parts characterize the lifetime of the quasi-normal states. Regarding the transmission of radiation through random media, it is more appropriate to use an alternative approach based on transmission resonances (TR): open channels, through which the radiation transmits with high efficiency [3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].Recently, physicists came to realize that focusing radiation into such channels could not only enhance the total intensity transmitted through strongly-scattering media, but also: significantly improve images blurred by random scattering, facilitate the detection and location of objects, provide optical tomography at very large depths, etc. [13,17,18,20,23]. To efficiently excite transmission resonances, it is preferable to treat them as superpositions of QNMs, with which the incident signal can be coupled by a properly-shaped wavefront [13,14]. The great potential of such algorithms for a host of practical applications is obvious. This is why the relation between transmission resonances and QNMs have recently attracted particular attention of both the physical [12,[24][25][26][27][28] and mathematical communities [1].It is now universally accepted that in open systems (e.g., quantum potential wells, optical cavities, or microwave resonators) each maximum in the transmission coefficient (i.e., transmission resonance) is associated with a QNM, so that the resonant frequency is close to the real part of the corresponding eigenvalue. QNMs and TRs are often considered identical. For example, the solutions of the eigenvalue problem (with no incoming waves), which in physics are unambiguously called QNMs, in the mathematical community dealing with the scattering inverse problem, are termed transmission eigenvalu...