1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.1237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dislocation Scattering in GaN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
283
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 447 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
21
283
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 A possible explanation for the decrease in electron mobility with decreasing carrier concentration can be found in Weimann et al where edge type threading dislocations in c-plane oriented GaN are considered to be lines of deepacceptor-like traps which are populated by donated electrons, thus producing charged lines that act as scattering centers. 21,22 Their model, which matches reasonably well with experimental results from c-plane oriented samples, results in a large amount of Si concentration dependent compensation which is qualitatively similar to that shown in Fig. 9 and in a decrease in electron mobility with decreasing free electron concentration below ϳ10 18 cm −3 due to reduced screening of line charges.…”
Section: Si-doped M-gansupporting
confidence: 77%
“…20 A possible explanation for the decrease in electron mobility with decreasing carrier concentration can be found in Weimann et al where edge type threading dislocations in c-plane oriented GaN are considered to be lines of deepacceptor-like traps which are populated by donated electrons, thus producing charged lines that act as scattering centers. 21,22 Their model, which matches reasonably well with experimental results from c-plane oriented samples, results in a large amount of Si concentration dependent compensation which is qualitatively similar to that shown in Fig. 9 and in a decrease in electron mobility with decreasing free electron concentration below ϳ10 18 cm −3 due to reduced screening of line charges.…”
Section: Si-doped M-gansupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It was argued that, in the case of low dopant concentrations, dislocation scattering dominates whereas impurity scattering becomes significant at high carrier concentration due to screening of the dislocation charge. [31][32][33] Therefore, the slight difference in plasmon damping in the Ga-and N-face domains can be explained by differences in threading dislocation density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to get a rough estimate of p versus dislocation density, we simply assumed a single valence band, with an associated hole effective mass of 2.0m 0 , and then followed the treatment of Ref. 9. The results are presented in the inset of Fig.…”
Section: Lϭͱd ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%