2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000800013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseño metodológico de la Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres en México

Abstract: Objective. To describe the methodology, the research designs used, the estimation and sample selection, variable definitions, collection instruments, and operative design and analytical procedures for the National Survey Violence Against Women in Mexico. Material and Methods. A complex (two-step) cross-sectional study was designed and the qualitative design was carried out using in-depth interviews and participant observation in health care units. Results. We obtained for the quantitative study a total of 26 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
16

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy between our findings and the results of previous studies may be because of our small sample size and the relatively low prevalence of childhood violence reported by study participants. A national survey in Mexico on violence against women in 2006 showed a prevalence of retrospectively reported childhood violence to be 37.6%, whereas we observed a prevalence of 13.4%. This discrepancy could be explained by differences in data collection methods (eg, interviews versus self‐reports) and use of different instruments for assessing violence.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy between our findings and the results of previous studies may be because of our small sample size and the relatively low prevalence of childhood violence reported by study participants. A national survey in Mexico on violence against women in 2006 showed a prevalence of retrospectively reported childhood violence to be 37.6%, whereas we observed a prevalence of 13.4%. This discrepancy could be explained by differences in data collection methods (eg, interviews versus self‐reports) and use of different instruments for assessing violence.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…This discrepancy could be explained by differences in data collection methods (eg, interviews versus self‐reports) and use of different instruments for assessing violence. Another possibility may be the fact that the states of Chiapas and Yucatan, where our study took place, have the lowest incidence of domestic violence and criminal activity in Mexico . Finally, women included in our study may have chosen not to report violent events, especially those occurring during childhood and/or those sexual in nature, because of social norms or fear of potential disclosure of this information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several surveys to date have accessed representative samples (e.g., Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, 2007; Moracco, Runyan, Bowling & Earp, 2007;Olaiz, Franco, Palma, Echarri, Valdez & Herrera, 2006;Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000;World Health Organization, 2005). However, few are gender-inclusive, that is most do not ask both men and women about their victimization and perpetration toward intimate partners.…”
Section: Methodology Of Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se diseñó un cuestionario de conocimientos y actitudes específico para las condiciones de la Violencia basada en el Género en la facultad de medicina teniendo como referencia los estudios realizados por Nagata-Kobayashi et al (26); la Federación Internacional de Planificación Familiar, Región del Hemisferio Occidental (IPPF-RHO) para la detección sistemática de VBG (27) y la Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres realizada en México en el año 2003 (28). El cuestionario fue diseñado en dos segmentos.…”
Section: Instrumentos Y Medidasunclassified