2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-016-0862-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease risk assessment of sugar beet root rot using quantitative real-time PCR analysis of Aphanomyces cochlioides in naturally infested soil samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The species-specific primers, listed in Table 2 , were used to analyze the level of natural infestation in 429 soil samples from two Swedish regions with intensive farming. The soil samples had all high clay content, representing characteristics as in soil mixture number four analyzed by Almquist et al ( 2016 ). A study showing that the limit of DNA detection was lowest in samples with high clay content using similar soil handling and DNA extraction methodology as presented here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The species-specific primers, listed in Table 2 , were used to analyze the level of natural infestation in 429 soil samples from two Swedish regions with intensive farming. The soil samples had all high clay content, representing characteristics as in soil mixture number four analyzed by Almquist et al ( 2016 ). A study showing that the limit of DNA detection was lowest in samples with high clay content using similar soil handling and DNA extraction methodology as presented here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The detection limit for the P. tracheiphilum multiplexed qPCR assay was established as 10 oospores/g of dry soil, with coefficients of variation less than 2%. In comparison, the detection limit was determined to be between 1 and 50 oospores/g of soil (depending on soil clay content) for Aphanomyces cochlioides (Almquist et al 2016), 10 oospores/g of soil for A. euteiches (Gangneux et al 2014), and 20 oospores/g of soil for Phytophthora infestans (Hussain et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the development of a risk index based on inoculum potential measured by real-time qPCR would be possible. The estimation of inoculum potential by real-time qPCR was proven to be successful for several soilborne diseases such as those caused by A. euteiches (Gangneux et al 2014;Sauvage et al 2007), A. cochlioides (Almquist et al 2016), and Plasmodiophora brassicae (Wallenhammar et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the limitations posed by these methods, real-time qPCR has become the method of choice for detection of phytopathogenic fungi, bacteria and oomyctes in diverse plant tissues (reviewed in Sanzani et al 2014 ) and other environmental samples such as soil (e.g., Almquist et al 2016 , Zhu et al 2016 ). Recently, qPCR was used to quantify growth patterns of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral et al, the causative agent of ash dieback, in stems of Fraxinus excelsior trees, demonstrating the utility of this technology to understand pathogen invasion of the host tree ( Matsiakh et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%