1992
DOI: 10.1002/asm.3150080107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant versus rough sets approach to vague data analysis

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents a comparative study of the use of two different methods of data analysis on a common set of data. The first is a method based on rough sets theory and the second is the location model method from the field of discriminant analysis. To investigate the comparative performance of these methods, a set of real medical data has been used. The data considered are of both discrete and continuous character. During the comparison, particular attention is paid to data reduction and to the deriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some relations exist between the rough set theory and discriminant analysis [3] and the Boolean reasoning methods [11].…”
Section: The Relationship To Other Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some relations exist between the rough set theory and discriminant analysis [3] and the Boolean reasoning methods [11].…”
Section: The Relationship To Other Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of rough sets we can use more heuristic approaches, e.g. connected with dynamic reducts [16] or dividing the set of attributes into some disjoint subsystems and analysing the significance of attributes inside these subsystems (see [18,28]) or an idea of using, so-called, data templates [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed us to select the subset of attributes. The methodology used in this part of the analysis followed the general methodological schema presented in [20,18,24,27].…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exhaustive information can be found in (Pawlak, Z. 1982;or Fibak, J. et al, 1986;Slowinski, K., et al 1988;Krusinska, E. et al, 1992;Slowinski, R. and Stefanowski, J., 1989).…”
Section: The Rough Sets Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%