2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2971908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Models Applied to Control the Knee Joint Movement of Paraplegic Patients

Abstract: In this manuscript, a method for designing Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy discrete-time regulators based on linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) is proposed to control the variation of the knee joint angle movement of paraplegic patients through electrical stimulation. A simple method for discretizing nonlinear systems described by T-S fuzzy models is used. The control strategy is applied for a paraplegic volunteer and a healthy one. The results and analysis show that the controlled system attended the design specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e nonlinear function 􏽥 f 21 (x 1 ) is exactly represented by the convex combination of these two local models: [2,3,5,11,13]. Note that, from (26), α 1 ≥ 0, α 2 ≥ 0, and…”
Section: Knee Joint Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…e nonlinear function 􏽥 f 21 (x 1 ) is exactly represented by the convex combination of these two local models: [2,3,5,11,13]. Note that, from (26), α 1 ≥ 0, α 2 ≥ 0, and…”
Section: Knee Joint Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e mathematical model of the system, which relates the pulse width applied for the muscle to the torque generated at the knee joint, is presented in Section 4. e parameters of the system, presented in [2,3], were obtained experimentally. e parameters related to the shank-foot complex and their numerical values are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Numerical Model Of the Paraplegic Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has the capacity to supply currents with amplitudes of up to 140 mA, with a 1-mA step, pulse width (PW) from 0 to 500 μs, with a step of 1 μs, and frequency (F) from 20 to 300 Hz, with a step of 1 Hz. The stimulator has a currentbased output allowing its use in closed-loop control (Arcolezi et al 2019Nunes et al 2019;Gaino et al 2020;Teodoro et al 2020). The output stage of this stimulator is current, which is a great advantage for its use in control, as it makes it possible to control and predict the amount of current applied to the muscle, even if the coupling resistance and tissue impedance change.…”
Section: Test Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%