2011
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancies between implicit and explicit attitude measures as an indicator of attitude strength

Abstract: The current research investigates whether implicit-explicit attitudinal discrepancy (IED) weakens attitudes as explicit discrepancies do. Across two experiments, we found that IED is an indicator of weak attitudes. In Experiment 1, we found that individuals with greater IED toward exercise were more swayed by a self-perceptual manipulation than individuals with lower IED toward exercise. In Experiment 2, we found that the stability and predictive power of attitudes toward alcohol were lessened for participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More positively, there is strong evidence from both the implicit and explicit responses demonstrating solidarity with fellow Japanese speakers of English. The consistency found between implicit and explicit attitude ratings, where a clear tendency was found for participants to evaluate (speakers) of different forms of South and East Asian English negatively, with the exception of Japanese English, points to an absence of social desirability bias in the explicit evaluations and indicates that Japanese students' attitudes towards these speech forms are strong, relatively stable and resistant to change (see Karpen, Jia, and Rydell ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More positively, there is strong evidence from both the implicit and explicit responses demonstrating solidarity with fellow Japanese speakers of English. The consistency found between implicit and explicit attitude ratings, where a clear tendency was found for participants to evaluate (speakers) of different forms of South and East Asian English negatively, with the exception of Japanese English, points to an absence of social desirability bias in the explicit evaluations and indicates that Japanese students' attitudes towards these speech forms are strong, relatively stable and resistant to change (see Karpen, Jia, and Rydell ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Attitudes are a key construct in social psychology and are regarded as important determinants across various (health) behaviors. Both implicit and explicit attitudes can predict the same (health) behavior [26,27] and individuals can hold dissonant explicit and implicit attitudes towards the same behavior or object [28][29][30][31]. Similarly to dissonant self-relevant constructs, dissonant attitudes are experienced as unpleasant [29] and lead to difficulties in functioning, which individuals are highly motivated to diminish.…”
Section: Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also it was claimed that "Meat should be of special interest to psychologists, because it is a quintessential example of the interesting and important state of ambivalence" [47]. Based on this knowledge, we expected dissonance regarding RMC to exist between the implicit and the explicit level as it has been shown for other behaviors [28][29][30][31] and, therefore, selected the behavior at hand to answer the research questions. Moreover, shedding light on the relationships between IED and RMC could support the development of future interventions that are aiming to reduce RMC.…”
Section: Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nosek (2007) shows that more socially sensitive issues, like AA policies, tend to exhibit greater implicit-explicit discrepancy. This finding is important because predictive attitude validity is affected by the strength of the association between implicit and explicit measures, with greater discrepancies decreasing attitude predictive validity over behavior (Karpen, Jia, & Rydell, 2012). Consequently, a greater discrepancy between implicit and explicit attitudes on AA may reduce our ability to predict behaviors related to AA, more generally.…”
Section: Measurement Of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes On Aa Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%