1993
DOI: 10.1086/172750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of orbital decay in SMC X-1

Abstract: If you have any further questions of an administrative nature please call me at (617) 253-6103. Questions of a technical nature should be directed to Professor Rappaport (617) 253-7551. Thank you for your help.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects may even allow violations of the Eddington limit by a factor as large as 100 (Begelman 2002(Begelman , 2006) so our super-Eddington model may remain conservative. On the other hand, NS accretors seem to remain within twice the Eddington rate (Levine et al 1991(Levine et al , 1993Grimm et al 2003a). This approximation has subsequently been employed in several theoretical models of luminous X-ray binary formation (Rappaport et al 2005;Fragos et al 2008), and we adopt this assumption throughout.…”
Section: Simulation Code and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These effects may even allow violations of the Eddington limit by a factor as large as 100 (Begelman 2002(Begelman , 2006) so our super-Eddington model may remain conservative. On the other hand, NS accretors seem to remain within twice the Eddington rate (Levine et al 1991(Levine et al , 1993Grimm et al 2003a). This approximation has subsequently been employed in several theoretical models of luminous X-ray binary formation (Rappaport et al 2005;Fragos et al 2008), and we adopt this assumption throughout.…”
Section: Simulation Code and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For all these sources, a number of different mechanisms have been invoked to explain the orbital period decay (see, e.g., Kelley et al 1983; van der Klis 1983; van der Klis & Bonnet-Bidaud 1984; Levine et al 1993Levine et al , 2000Rubin et al 1996;Safi Harb et al 1996;Jenke et al 2012). The hypothesis that the period change is entirely due to angular momentum loss in the stellar wind, that is, to mass transfer without interaction, can be ruled out.…”
Section: Orbital Period Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal interactions in close binary systems have also been investigated in detail theoretically by using different approaches, for example, by assuming that the rotation of the donor star is synchronized or pseudosynchronized 6 with the orbital motion of the compact star (see, e.g., Moreno et al 2011;Hut 1981;Zahn 1977;Lecar et al 1976). A number of other works argued that the combined effects of the evolutionary growth of the moment of inertia (expansion of the donor star) and mass loss by stellar wind from a donor star can explain the orbital decay in HMXBs (Bagot 1996;Levine et al 1993). In these models, it is considered that as the companion star evolves, it expands and increases its moment of inertia, leading to a slowdown of the stellar rotation.…”
Section: Orbital Period Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Orbital decay in high-mass X-ray binaries (containing a massive main-sequence or giant star with an accreting neutron star companion) can be driven by a secular instability of the type discussed here. Examples of systems where rapid orbital decay has been directly observed include Cen X-3, where the orbital period is decreasing on a timescale t decay ' 5 10 5 yr (Kelley et al 1983), and SMC X-1, where t decay ' 3 10 5 yr (Levine et al 1993). In both cases it is thought that the unstable orbital decay is driven by tidal dissipation (Levine et al 1991(Levine et al , 1993.…”
Section: Common Envelope Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%