2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of new members of the nearby young stellar association in Cepheus

Abstract: Context. Young field stars are hardly distinguishable from older ones because their space motion rapidly mixes them with the stellar population of the Galactic plane. Nevertheless, a careful target selection allows for young stars to be spotted throughout the sky. Aims. We aim to identify additional sources associated with the four young comoving stars that we discovered towards the CO Cepheus void and to provide a comprehensive view of the Cepheus association. Methods. Based on multivariate analysis methods, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likely associated with the bright star Gaia EDR3 576260267526450048, a spectroscopic binary in a young stellar association (Klutsch et al 2020). Hence, likely a coronally active star.…”
Section: Appendix A: Notes On Individual Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likely associated with the bright star Gaia EDR3 576260267526450048, a spectroscopic binary in a young stellar association (Klutsch et al 2020). Hence, likely a coronally active star.…”
Section: Appendix A: Notes On Individual Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likely associated with bright star Gaia EDR3 576260267526450048, a spectroscopic binary in a young stellar association (Klutsch et al 2020). Hence, likely a coronally active star.…”
Section: Srga J0115119+882912mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thicker portions of the error bars indicate the interquartile range, and the median values from the IMF sampling are indicated by the horizontal lines. Our motivation for this approach is to ask what the range of magma ocean detection probabilities could be due to sampling an IMF, and therefore what the range of detection probabilities would be for any hypothetical YMGs that may be newly discovered by, e.g., GaiaDR2, or later data releases (e.g., Liu et al 2020), or if the membership of existing YMGs is significantly augmented by new detections (e.g., Binks et al 2020;Klutsch et al 2020).…”
Section: Detecting Magma Ocean Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most stars form in groups (often loosely referred to as clusters) with membership ranging between 10 s and 10 4 stars (Lada & Lada 2003). It is thought that planets form from circumstellar disks of dust and gas almost immediately after star formation, and certainly during the earliest stages of a premain-sequence star's life (Haisch et al 2001;ALMA Partnership et al 2015;Richert et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%