2007
DOI: 10.1558/lhs.2005.1.2.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse analysis in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their study also shows that these children do use cohesive devices, like pronouns, whose reference is to be found either in the surrounding discourse or in the exterior context. Likewise, persons with high‐functioning autism and with Asperger syndrome employ cohesive markers; the way they are used, however, is not tuned to the interlocutor's needs, nor to the flow of the conversation (Fine et al , 1994; de Villiers, 2005; see also Capps et al , 1998). Such data are fully compatible with the view defended here.…”
Section: Pragmatics In Asdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their study also shows that these children do use cohesive devices, like pronouns, whose reference is to be found either in the surrounding discourse or in the exterior context. Likewise, persons with high‐functioning autism and with Asperger syndrome employ cohesive markers; the way they are used, however, is not tuned to the interlocutor's needs, nor to the flow of the conversation (Fine et al , 1994; de Villiers, 2005; see also Capps et al , 1998). Such data are fully compatible with the view defended here.…”
Section: Pragmatics In Asdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrative is classified within pragmatics as a branch of linguistics that recognizes the role of context and inferred intention. The analysis of narrative discourse is considered a valid method for analyzing pragmatic skill because the analysis moves beyond the sentential level and provides a functional evaluation of social communication and cognition (De Villiers, 2005; Van Dijk, 2011). Delivery of a successful narrative requires the ability to (a) organize one’s thoughts and experiences using causal-explanatory relationships (Peterson & McCabe, 1983); (b) understand one’s own social, cultural, and emotional perspectives and that of others in a variety of contexts (Bruner, 1986); (c) evaluate what information is needed by the listener to form a shared frame of reference; (d) monitor and adjust the style and content of the interaction based on the listener’s reactions; and (e) integrate all of these tasks to produce a cohesive and compelling account or exchange (Karmiloff-Smith, 1985; Peterson & McCabe, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%