Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that self-estimation by means of simple screening questions can select persons who are in special need of improving their lifestyle. A recent study shows discordance between self-evaluated health and GP rating of general health status [19]. It is well documented that interventions should optimally be multifactorial and target highrisk patients with multiple risk factors [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that self-estimation by means of simple screening questions can select persons who are in special need of improving their lifestyle. A recent study shows discordance between self-evaluated health and GP rating of general health status [19]. It is well documented that interventions should optimally be multifactorial and target highrisk patients with multiple risk factors [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of agreement between doctors’ health assessments and patients’ interpretation of their health risks could lead to non-compliance that inhibits the identification of health problems and subsequently the application of preventive and remedial plans for reduction or elimination of health risks [36]. Some individuals do not always connect health diagnoses negative risk behaviors they are health optimists who practice optimistic bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-rated health status (SRHS) or self-assessed health (SAH) is perhaps one of the most commonly used subjective measures one finds in the literature. This is used both in economics (e.g., Bago d'Uva et al, 2008;Böckerman and Ilmakunnas, 2009) as well as in epidemiology (e.g., Bago d'Uva, O'Donnell, and van Doorslaer, 2008;Geest, Engberg, and Lauritzen, 2004;Ernsten et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%