Disability Rating Form

Hoyle, Rick H.; Nietzel, Michael T.; Guthrie, Pamela R.; Baker-Prewitt, Jamie L.; Heine, Richard W.

doi:10.1037/t25699-000

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Hierarchical Criterion-based Assessment Of the Instruments1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2017

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All five have been subject to Designed to rate disabilities associated with severe mental illness. Five items measure five areas of disability: activity of daily living, social functioning, concentration and task performance, adaptation to change and impulse control (Hoyle et al, 1992(Hoyle et al, , 1993.…”

Section: Hierarchical Criterion-based Assessment Of the Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of clinician-rated instruments to assess adults’ levels of functioning in specialised public sector mental health services

Burgess

Harris

Coombs

et al. 2017

Aust N Z J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Further work is required to determine which, if any, of these instruments satisfy further criteria relating to their appropriateness for assessing functioning within relevant service contexts, acceptability to clinicians and consumers, and feasibility in routine practice. This should involve seeking stakeholders' opinions (e.g. about the specific domains of functioning covered by each instrument and the language used in individual items) and testing completion rates in busy service settings.

show abstract

Section: Hierarchical Criterion-based Assessment Of the Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%