2000
DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.2.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directly Observed Therapy to Treat HIV Infection in Prisoners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…43 An Italian study comparing DOT with modified DOT showed that the DOT group had significantly better virological and immunologic results than the other one. 44 On the other side, a US study showed no differences in adherence to ART for patients receiving DOT and those who self-administered their medication. 24 Discordant opinions exist about the introduction of the DOT strategy for ART administration in prisons.…”
Section: Adherence To Antiretroviral Therapy and Modalities Of Adminimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…43 An Italian study comparing DOT with modified DOT showed that the DOT group had significantly better virological and immunologic results than the other one. 44 On the other side, a US study showed no differences in adherence to ART for patients receiving DOT and those who self-administered their medication. 24 Discordant opinions exist about the introduction of the DOT strategy for ART administration in prisons.…”
Section: Adherence To Antiretroviral Therapy and Modalities Of Adminimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[13][14][15] However, there are concerns regarding lack of confidentiality and stigma, [16][17][18][19] as well as sustained benefits of DOT after release from correctional facilities, when patients must transition to self-administra-tion of medications. Data show that the proportion of those who continue ARVs immediately after release is low, 16,[20][21][22][23][24] which is particularly important, as the postrelease period is a time of high-risk behaviors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] The results of our study are also similar to those obtained in correctional settings and noncorrectional settings with mandatory directly observed therapy (DOT) for HAART. [37][38][39] One recent study compared patients enrolled in clinical trials who received directly observed HIV therapy in a correctional setting to those in trials in community settings. 40 Results of this study showed that 80% of patients receiving DOT achieved a nondetectable viral load compared to 50% in the selected community-derived sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Rates of nondetectable viral load in patients receiving HAART in clinical care settings average [41][42][43] around 50%. While DOT has been demonstrated to provide a structural intervention for the treatment of tuberculosis, 1,44 limited feasibility has been demonstrated for the management of HIV outside highly structured correctional, 39,40 skilled nursing, 45 and methadone maintenance settings. 46 Modified directly observed therapy (mDOT) has been suggested, but feasibility has yet to be demonstrated in community settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%