1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00874332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

53
708
4
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 833 publications
(786 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
53
708
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We presume that l is independent of the pressure based on a previous established experimental observation [Dieterich and Kilgore, 1994]. Thus, V w is independent of the pressure.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Intermediate-velocity Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presume that l is independent of the pressure based on a previous established experimental observation [Dieterich and Kilgore, 1994]. Thus, V w is independent of the pressure.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Intermediate-velocity Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we assume (1) and (2) represent the shear resistance of a population of contacts between particles or asperities in the fault zone, consistent with the original usage of Dieterich [1979]. Accordingly, the direct effect represents the strain rate sensitivity of points of contact on the fault surface, and the evolution effect represents the sensitivity of friction to the change in area of contacts in the fault zone [Dieterich, 1979;Dieterich and Conrad, 1984;Dieterich and Kilgore, 1994]. …”
Section: Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real contact areas at asperities increase more rapidly during holds in friction tests than one would infer by measuring friction after sliding resumes or after changes in sliding velocity [Dieterich and Kilgore, 1994;Goldsby et al, 2004]. The first increment of shear strain before friction peaks at the restart of sliding after the holds destroys some of the real area of contact, weakening the gouge without changing porosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Results from many laboratory friction experiments suggest that the state variable can be related to the effective contact area of asperities in the active shear band [e.g., Dieterich and Kilgore, 1994] or to the energy available to dilate the gouge layer [Beeler and Tullis, 1997].…”
Section: Porosity and The State Variablementioning
confidence: 99%