2019
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201920190132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilemma in the Brazilian Tropical Medicine: ‘Is speed more important than direction?’

Abstract: With the recent changes in the epidemiology of infectious diseases in Brazil, research funding has been changing in a manner that does not properly consider biodiversity and poverty-related diseases. The burden of disease and the affected neglected populations need to be part of the equation in developeding countries with limited funding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The country should therefore be a protagonist in controlling deforestation and climate change and their impacts on infectious diseases. Since the country has the largest portion of the Amazon rainforest, Brazil should keep its leading role in health research in Latin America (Lacerda et al 2019).…”
Section: How To Mitigate the Impacts Of Deforestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The country should therefore be a protagonist in controlling deforestation and climate change and their impacts on infectious diseases. Since the country has the largest portion of the Amazon rainforest, Brazil should keep its leading role in health research in Latin America (Lacerda et al 2019).…”
Section: How To Mitigate the Impacts Of Deforestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many infectious diseases are endemic to the Amazon region as a result of the region's natural landscape (Confalonieri 2005). Almost all cases of malaria in Brazil occur in the Amazon region (Lacerda et al 2019). A huge decrease in the human cases of these diseases would only be feasible through the absence of human contact with the forest, which is unrealistic and not beneficial for humans.…”
Section: Additional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%