2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/eusipco.2016.7760355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitally-controlled RF self-interference canceller for full-duplex radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for a transmit power of P s = 1 W = 0 dBW, the Rayleigh fading channels have variances -20 dB and -80 dB for the S-R and R-D channel respectively. The loopback self-interference link is assumed to have Rician fading with shape parameter or K-factor = 30 dB and effective channel gain, including the effect of path loss/passive physical isolation between the transmit and receive chains sharing antennas at the relay through a circulator device, as Ω = −20dB [27] [28]. The Rician channel F is modeled as the sum of a fixed component and a variable (or scattered) component as below…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for a transmit power of P s = 1 W = 0 dBW, the Rayleigh fading channels have variances -20 dB and -80 dB for the S-R and R-D channel respectively. The loopback self-interference link is assumed to have Rician fading with shape parameter or K-factor = 30 dB and effective channel gain, including the effect of path loss/passive physical isolation between the transmit and receive chains sharing antennas at the relay through a circulator device, as Ω = −20dB [27] [28]. The Rician channel F is modeled as the sum of a fixed component and a variable (or scattered) component as below…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, this SI signal should be cancelled to below the original noise floor at the point of receiver decoding so that the SNR is not deteriorated from it. For example, if a TX signal in a WiFi network has an output power of 20 dBm and the receiver noise floor is -90 dBm, it follows that over 110 dB of SI cancellation is necessary for a FD radio to have good performance [5]. There has been a lot of research recently into different techniques to achieve this desired cancellation and they can be divided into three categories: passive suppression, digital cancellation, and analog cancellation depending on which section of the radio that the cancellation occurs.…”
Section: Self Interference Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, an RF-VM is used in [5] to replace the tunable attenuator [4]. The use of an RF-VM enabled finer resolution in controlling the magnitude and phase of each tap and an adaptive algorithm is developed to accurately adjust each of them.…”
Section: Analog Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A received SI signal is canceled by a radio-frequency (RF) analog SI canceller. The balun canceller [3] reduces a line of sight (LOS) component of the SI signal, and the multi-tap RF canceller [4] can reduce several delayed SI signals. Digital SI cancellers are necessary to eliminate long delayed and remained SI signals since RF cancellers cannot reduce the power of the SI signal to the noise floor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%